LVHI vs. FBND
LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) and FBND (Fidelity Total Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LVHI is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR, while FBND is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity. LVHI is passively managed, while FBND is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, LVHI returned 15.67%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for FBND. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LVHI charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for FBND.
Performance
LVHI vs. FBND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVHI achieves a 11.45% return, which is significantly higher than FBND's 0.10% return.
LVHI
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 11.45%
- 6M
- 13.55%
- 1Y
- 29.27%
- 3Y*
- 20.97%
- 5Y*
- 15.67%
- 10Y*
- —
FBND
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 0.40%
- 1Y
- 5.34%
- 3Y*
- 4.60%
- 5Y*
- 0.68%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
LVHI vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 11.45% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 3.84% | 18.19% | -8.76% | 18.35% | -5.22% | 12.26% |
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 0.10% | 7.57% | 2.13% | 6.81% | -12.54% | -0.43% | 9.41% | 9.82% | -0.57% | 3.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVHI and FBND is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2016 | 0.07 |
The correlation between LVHI and FBND shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.23 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
LVHI vs. FBND - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LVHI
FBND
Financial Services
Energy
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
LVHI
FBND
Energy
LVHI
FBND
Industrials
LVHI
FBND
Utilities
LVHI
FBND
Consumer Defensive
LVHI
FBND
-
Healthcare
LVHI
FBND
-
Basic Materials
LVHI
FBND
-
Communication Services
LVHI
FBND
-
Consumer Cyclical
LVHI
FBND
-
Real Estate
LVHI
FBND
-
Technology
LVHI
FBND
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVHI vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank
LVHI
FBND
LVHI vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LVHI | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.25 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.84 | 2.01 | +2.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.99 | 5.97 | +14.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LVHI | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.10 | 1.41 | +1.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.42 | 0.12 | +1.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.44 | +0.38 |
Drawdowns
LVHI vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVHI drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, which is greater than FBND's maximum drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHI and FBND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVHI | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.31% | -17.25% | -15.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.08% | -2.66% | -3.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.99% | -5.94% | -6.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.99% | -17.25% | +5.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.79% | -1.82% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -3.35% | -0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.47% | 0.90% | +0.57% |
Volatility
LVHI vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) has a higher volatility of 2.35% compared to Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) at 1.23%. This indicates that LVHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVHI | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.35% | 1.23% | +1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.58% | 2.75% | +4.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.50% | 3.80% | +5.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.07% | 5.92% | +5.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.76% | 6.10% | +7.66% |
LVHI vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVHI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
LVHI vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison
LVHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than FBND's 4.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 4.72% | 4.70% | 4.73% | 4.26% | 3.07% | 1.86% | 4.25% | 2.90% | 2.93% | 2.56% | 2.84% | 3.26% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 4.79% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LVHI and FBND have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LVHI has higher volatility (2.35%) compared to FBND (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHI dropped -32.31% vs FBND's -17.25%.
On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.67% vs 0.68% for FBND. On fees, FBND is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, FBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.67% return vs 0.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FBND is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LVHI.
LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 4.72% for FBND.
LVHI is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while FBND is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LVHI and 0.36% for FBND.
LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LVHI and FBND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer