LVDS vs. PRF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LVDS (JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF) and PRF (Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. LVDS is actively managed, while PRF is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LVDS charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for PRF.

Performance

LVDS vs. PRF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS) and Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVDS achieves a 13.56% return, which is significantly lower than PRF's 14.79% return.

LVDS

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 3.85%
• YTD: 13.56%
• 6M: 14.52%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PRF

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 4.19%
• YTD: 14.79%
• 6M: 15.01%
• 1Y: 32.80%
• 3Y*: 21.40%
• 5Y*: 12.43%
• 10Y*: 13.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LVDS vs. PRF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LVDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF	13.56%	7.24%
PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF	14.79%	10.41%

Correlation

The correlation between LVDS and PRF is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025	0.94

LVDS vs. PRF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LVDS	PRF
Financial Services	18.3%	15.4%
Technology	15.9%	20.9%
Industrials	10.2%	9.2%
Healthcare	8.6%	11.7%
Consumer Cyclical	8.0%	9.1%
Communication Services	7.5%	10.2%
Energy	6.6%	8.2%
Consumer Defensive	6.5%	6.3%
Utilities	4.8%	3.1%
Real Estate	4.2%	2.5%
Basic Materials	1.7%	3.4%

Return for Risk

LVDS vs. PRF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRF

PRF Risk / Return Rank: 89
PRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
PRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
PRF Omega Ratio Rank: 88
PRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
PRF Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LVDS vs. PRF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS) and Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LVDS	PRF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.10	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.82	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.39	0.48	+1.91

Drawdowns

LVDS vs. PRF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVDS drawdown since its inception was -6.64%, smaller than the maximum PRF drawdown of -60.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVDS and PRF.

Drawdown Indicators

	LVDS	PRF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.64%	-60.35%	+53.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.59%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.82%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.72%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.20%	+0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.98%	-6.93%	+5.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.59%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LVDS	PRF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.64%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.74%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.43%	10.63%	-0.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.43%	15.18%	-4.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.43%	17.67%	-7.24%

LVDS vs. PRF - Expense Ratio Comparison

LVDS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than PRF's 0.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

LVDS vs. PRF - Dividend Comparison

LVDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.56%, more than PRF's 1.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LVDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF	7.56%	8.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF	1.38%	1.59%	1.78%	1.84%	2.01%	1.58%	1.97%	1.99%	2.25%	1.58%	2.17%	2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LVDS and PRF in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, LVDS and PRF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, LVDS or PRF?

On fees, LVDS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LVDS or PRF?

LVDS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for PRF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LVDS or PRF?

LVDS has the higher dividend yield at 7.56%, compared with 1.38% for PRF.

What is the main difference between LVDS and PRF?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LVDS and 0.34% for PRF.