LVDS vs. MFVL
LVDS (JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF) and MFVL (Motley Fool Value Factor ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LVDS charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for MFVL.
Performance
LVDS vs. MFVL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVDS achieves a 13.56% return, which is significantly higher than MFVL's 0.39% return.
LVDS
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 13.56%
- 6M
- 14.52%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFVL
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 0.39%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LVDS vs. MFVL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LVDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF | 13.56% | 1.74% |
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | 0.39% | 1.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVDS and MFVL is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVDS vs. MFVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS) and Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LVDS | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.39 | 0.31 | +2.07 |
Drawdowns
LVDS vs. MFVL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVDS drawdown since its inception was -6.64%, smaller than the maximum MFVL drawdown of -7.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVDS and MFVL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVDS | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.64% | -7.03% | +0.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.29% | +3.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.98% | -2.42% | +1.44% |
Volatility
LVDS vs. MFVL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVDS | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.43% | 12.15% | -1.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.43% | 12.15% | -1.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.43% | 12.15% | -1.72% |
LVDS vs. MFVL - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVDS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than MFVL's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
LVDS vs. MFVL - Dividend Comparison
LVDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.56%, while MFVL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LVDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF | 7.56% | 8.25% |
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LVDS and MFVL have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LVDS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LVDS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MFVL.
LVDS has the higher dividend yield at 7.56%, compared with 0.00% for MFVL.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Motley Fool. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LVDS and 0.50% for MFVL.
Find the right allocation for LVDS and MFVL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer