LVDS vs. FNDX
LVDS (JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF) and FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. LVDS is actively managed, while FNDX is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LVDS charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDX.
Performance
LVDS vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVDS achieves a 13.56% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 14.57% return.
LVDS
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 13.56%
- 6M
- 14.52%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNDX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 3.88%
- YTD
- 14.57%
- 6M
- 14.58%
- 1Y
- 32.32%
- 3Y*
- 20.90%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- 14.26%
LVDS vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LVDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF | 13.56% | 7.24% |
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 14.57% | 10.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVDS and FNDX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.94 |
LVDS vs. FNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LVDS
FNDX
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
LVDS
FNDX
Technology
LVDS
FNDX
Industrials
LVDS
FNDX
Healthcare
LVDS
FNDX
Consumer Cyclical
LVDS
FNDX
Communication Services
LVDS
FNDX
Energy
LVDS
FNDX
Consumer Defensive
LVDS
FNDX
Utilities
LVDS
FNDX
Real Estate
LVDS
FNDX
Basic Materials
LVDS
FNDX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVDS vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank
LVDS
FNDX
LVDS vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LVDS | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.39 | 0.79 | +1.59 |
Drawdowns
LVDS vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVDS drawdown since its inception was -6.64%, smaller than the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVDS and FNDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVDS | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.64% | -37.72% | +31.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.13% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.98% | -3.55% | +2.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.55% | — |
Volatility
LVDS vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVDS | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.25% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.25% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.43% | 10.22% | +0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.43% | 15.18% | -4.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.43% | 17.50% | -7.07% |
LVDS vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVDS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
LVDS vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison
LVDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.56%, more than FNDX's 1.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 1.45% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.82% | 2.07% | 1.64% | 2.29% | 2.23% | 2.40% | 1.86% | 2.01% | 2.01% |
LVDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF | 7.56% | 8.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, LVDS and FNDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, FNDX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FNDX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LVDS.
LVDS has the higher dividend yield at 7.56%, compared with 1.45% for FNDX.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LVDS and 0.25% for FNDX.
Find the right allocation for LVDS and FNDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer