PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LVAZX vs. LZEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LVAZX vs. LZEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LSV Emerging Markets Equity Fund (LVAZX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVAZX achieves a 36.52% return, which is significantly higher than LZEMX's 26.96% return.


LVAZX

1D
1.05%
1M
13.46%
YTD
36.52%
6M
41.03%
1Y
69.73%
3Y*
32.01%
5Y*
16.04%
10Y*

LZEMX

1D
0.90%
1M
7.95%
YTD
26.96%
6M
29.16%
1Y
57.41%
3Y*
29.23%
5Y*
13.38%
10Y*
11.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LVAZX vs. LZEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
LVAZX
LSV Emerging Markets Equity Fund
36.52%39.90%7.26%21.26%-13.03%13.77%5.03%5.91%
LZEMX
Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio
26.96%41.35%7.60%22.44%-14.86%5.37%-0.07%8.71%

Correlation

The correlation between LVAZX and LZEMX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2019

0.89

The correlation between LVAZX and LZEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LVAZX vs. LZEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LVAZX
LVAZX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
LVAZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVAZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVAZX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
LVAZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVAZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

LZEMX
LZEMX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
LZEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LZEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
LZEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
LZEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
LZEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LVAZX vs. LZEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LSV Emerging Markets Equity Fund (LVAZX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LVAZXLZEMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.84

1.81

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.16

5.58

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.21

20.53

+3.68

LVAZX vs. LZEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LVAZX Sharpe Ratio is 4.45, which is comparable to the LZEMX Sharpe Ratio of 4.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LVAZX and LZEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LVAZXLZEMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.45

4.35

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.12

0.94

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.41

+0.51

Drawdowns

LVAZX vs. LZEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVAZX drawdown since its inception was -37.87%, smaller than the maximum LZEMX drawdown of -60.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVAZX and LZEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LVAZXLZEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.87%

-60.08%

+22.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.44%

-10.42%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.02%

-14.27%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.07%

-30.55%

+3.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.78%

-16.63%

+9.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

2.83%

+0.08%

Volatility

LVAZX vs. LZEMX - Volatility Comparison

LSV Emerging Markets Equity Fund (LVAZX) has a higher volatility of 7.12% compared to Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX) at 5.21%. This indicates that LVAZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LZEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LVAZXLZEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.12%

5.21%

+1.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.54%

10.95%

+2.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.84%

13.37%

+2.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.36%

14.32%

+0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.92%

16.39%

-0.47%

LVAZX vs. LZEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LVAZX has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is higher than LZEMX's 1.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

LVAZX vs. LZEMX - Dividend Comparison

LVAZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than LZEMX's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LVAZX
LSV Emerging Markets Equity Fund
3.75%5.12%1.39%4.58%3.14%8.50%2.54%2.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LZEMX
Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio
1.61%2.05%3.11%3.76%5.92%4.89%2.11%2.45%2.10%1.99%1.48%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, LVAZX and LZEMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LVAZX has higher volatility (7.12%) compared to LZEMX (5.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVAZX dropped -37.87% vs LZEMX's -60.08%.

LVAZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.45 vs 4.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LVAZX and LZEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer