LSVQX vs. FDGRX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

LSVQX (LSV Small Cap Value Fund) and FDGRX (Fidelity Growth Company Fund) are both mutual funds - LSVQX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by LSV, while FDGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, LSVQX returned 9.07%/yr vs 23.19%/yr for FDGRX. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LSVQX charges 0.83%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for FDGRX.

Performance

LSVQX vs. FDGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LSV Small Cap Value Fund (LSVQX) and Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSVQX achieves a 15.12% return, which is significantly lower than FDGRX's 23.00% return. Over the past 10 years, LSVQX has underperformed FDGRX with an annualized return of 9.07%, while FDGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.19% annualized return.

LSVQX

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 2.61%
• YTD: 15.12%
• 6M: 13.02%
• 1Y: 29.83%
• 3Y*: 14.18%
• 5Y*: 9.20%
• 10Y*: 9.07%

FDGRX

• 1D: 1.85%
• 1M: 2.21%
• YTD: 23.00%
• 6M: 16.48%
• 1Y: 47.42%
• 3Y*: 30.07%
• 5Y*: 16.39%
• 10Y*: 23.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSVQX vs. FDGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LSVQX LSV Small Cap Value Fund	15.12%	7.31%	4.23%	19.02%	-6.24%	34.54%	-5.98%	20.59%	-17.41%	6.12%
FDGRX Fidelity Growth Company Fund	23.00%	18.54%	37.18%	47.25%	-33.86%	22.57%	67.42%	38.40%	-4.14%	36.76%

Correlation

The correlation between LSVQX and FDGRX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.48
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2013	0.61

The correlation between LSVQX and FDGRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LSVQX vs. FDGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSVQX

LSVQX Risk / Return Rank: 57
LSVQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
LSVQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
LSVQX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
LSVQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
LSVQX Martin Ratio Rank: 55

FDGRX

FDGRX Risk / Return Rank: 74
FDGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
FDGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
FDGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
FDGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FDGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSVQX vs. FDGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LSV Small Cap Value Fund (LSVQX) and Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LSVQX	FDGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	2.41	-0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.82	2.98	-0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.41	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.54	3.74	-0.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.49	13.71	-3.22

LSVQX vs. FDGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSVQX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the FDGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSVQX and FDGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LSVQX vs. FDGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSVQX drawdown since its inception was -54.77%, smaller than the maximum FDGRX drawdown of -71.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSVQX and FDGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LSVQX	FDGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.77%	-71.62%	+16.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.48%	-12.60%	+4.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.76%	-26.19%	+0.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.76%	-40.25%	+14.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.77%	-40.25%	-14.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.89%	-0.61%	-1.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.42%	-15.89%	+8.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.86%	3.42%	-0.56%

Volatility

LSVQX vs. FDGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LSV Small Cap Value Fund (LSVQX) is 4.11%, while Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) has a volatility of 7.50%. This indicates that LSVQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LSVQX	FDGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.11%	7.50%	-3.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.43%	15.80%	-5.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.67%	19.54%	-3.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.33%	24.10%	-3.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.30%	23.47%	+0.83%

LSVQX vs. FDGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSVQX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than FDGRX's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

LSVQX vs. FDGRX - Dividend Comparison

LSVQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.06%, while FDGRX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDGRX Fidelity Growth Company Fund	0.00%	0.00%	8.86%	3.83%	7.20%	10.67%	8.86%	3.84%	6.38%	4.73%	6.16%	3.92%
LSVQX LSV Small Cap Value Fund	7.06%	8.13%	1.78%	4.73%	2.02%	1.45%	1.83%	2.04%	7.00%	4.78%	2.35%	3.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LSVQX and FDGRX in my portfolio?

LSVQX and FDGRX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LSVQX or FDGRX?

FDGRX has higher volatility (7.50%) compared to LSVQX (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSVQX dropped -54.77% vs FDGRX's -71.62%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.