LVAGX vs. DSHGX
LVAGX (LSV Global Value Fund) and DSHGX (DFA Selectively Hedged Global Equity Portfolio) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, LVAGX returned 12.12%/yr vs 13.17%/yr for DSHGX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LVAGX charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for DSHGX.
Performance
LVAGX vs. DSHGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVAGX achieves a 22.05% return, which is significantly higher than DSHGX's 12.47% return. Over the past 10 years, LVAGX has underperformed DSHGX with an annualized return of 12.12%, while DSHGX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.17% annualized return.
LVAGX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- YTD
- 22.05%
- 6M
- 20.84%
- 1Y
- 40.93%
- 3Y*
- 22.69%
- 5Y*
- 12.92%
- 10Y*
- 12.12%
DSHGX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- YTD
- 12.47%
- 6M
- 11.58%
- 1Y
- 28.22%
- 3Y*
- 20.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.66%
- 10Y*
- 13.17%
LVAGX vs. DSHGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVAGX LSV Global Value Fund | 22.05% | 26.84% | 6.86% | 18.76% | -8.44% | 21.07% | 0.15% | 21.99% | -15.70% | 21.70% |
DSHGX DFA Selectively Hedged Global Equity Portfolio | 12.47% | 21.42% | 15.89% | 20.19% | -12.91% | 21.69% | 11.96% | 25.05% | -11.70% | 20.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVAGX and DSHGX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015 | 0.92 |
The correlation between LVAGX and DSHGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVAGX vs. DSHGX — Risk / Return Rank
LVAGX
DSHGX
LVAGX vs. DSHGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LSV Global Value Fund (LVAGX) and DFA Selectively Hedged Global Equity Portfolio (DSHGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LVAGX | DSHGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.44 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.76 | 3.18 | +2.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.96 | 13.54 | +7.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LVAGX vs. DSHGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVAGX drawdown since its inception was -42.32%, which is greater than DSHGX's maximum drawdown of -36.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVAGX and DSHGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVAGX | DSHGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.32% | -36.15% | -6.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.03% | -8.93% | +1.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.13% | -16.26% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.77% | -21.82% | -1.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.32% | -36.15% | -6.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.55% | -1.99% | -0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.99% | -4.48% | -2.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 2.09% | -0.16% |
Volatility
LVAGX vs. DSHGX - Volatility Comparison
LSV Global Value Fund (LVAGX) and DFA Selectively Hedged Global Equity Portfolio (DSHGX) have volatilities of 5.19% and 5.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVAGX | DSHGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.19% | 5.23% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.54% | 10.25% | +0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.29% | 12.16% | +1.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.40% | 14.71% | +0.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.87% | 16.02% | +0.85% |
LVAGX vs. DSHGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVAGX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than DSHGX's 0.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
LVAGX vs. DSHGX - Dividend Comparison
LVAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.23%, more than DSHGX's 2.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSHGX DFA Selectively Hedged Global Equity Portfolio | 2.84% | 3.20% | 5.56% | 6.18% | 9.61% | 6.56% | 2.10% | 2.50% | 4.62% | 1.11% | 3.07% | 3.04% |
LVAGX LSV Global Value Fund | 5.23% | 6.38% | 2.44% | 2.69% | 1.52% | 2.04% | 1.66% | 1.99% | 4.71% | 1.86% | 2.54% | 2.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LVAGX and DSHGX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DSHGX has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to LVAGX (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVAGX dropped -42.32% vs DSHGX's -36.15%.
LVAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LVAGX and DSHGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer