PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LUV vs. NKE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LUV vs. NKE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Southwest Airlines Co. (LUV) and NIKE, Inc. (NKE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LUV achieves a 0.94% return, which is significantly higher than NKE's -31.48% return. Over the past 10 years, LUV has outperformed NKE with an annualized return of 0.82%, while NKE has yielded a comparatively lower -0.82% annualized return.


LUV

1D
0.56%
1M
0.10%
YTD
0.94%
6M
10.70%
1Y
30.56%
3Y*
13.45%
5Y*
-5.20%
10Y*
0.82%

NKE

1D
-1.47%
1M
-1.17%
YTD
-31.48%
6M
-33.72%
1Y
-29.54%
3Y*
-24.47%
5Y*
-18.98%
10Y*
-0.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LUV vs. NKE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LUV
Southwest Airlines Co.
0.94%25.62%19.11%-11.82%-21.41%-8.09%-13.32%17.72%-28.21%32.40%
NKE
NIKE, Inc.
-31.48%-13.83%-29.11%-6.01%-29.04%18.70%40.97%38.09%19.87%24.70%

Correlation

The correlation between LUV and NKE is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 1980

0.26

The correlation between LUV and NKE shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LUV:

$20.89B

NKE:

$63.63B

EPS

LUV:

$1.56

NKE:

$1.52

PE Ratio

LUV:

26.58

NKE:

28.27

PS Ratio

LUV:

0.75

NKE:

1.37

PB Ratio

LUV:

3.04

NKE:

4.52

Total Revenue (TTM)

LUV:

$28.88B

NKE:

$46.52B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LUV:

$6.36B

NKE:

$18.99B

EBITDA (TTM)

LUV:

$2.74B

NKE:

$3.33B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LUV vs. NKE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LUV
LUV Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
LUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUV Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
LUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUV Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

NKE
NKE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
NKE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NKE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
NKE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
NKE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
NKE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LUV vs. NKE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Southwest Airlines Co. (LUV) and NIKE, Inc. (NKE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LUVNKEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

0.87

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

-0.64

+1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.85

-1.25

+3.10

LUV vs. NKE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LUV Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is higher than the NKE Sharpe Ratio of -0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LUV and NKE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LUVNKEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

-0.78

+1.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

-0.53

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

-0.03

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.41

-0.07

Drawdowns

LUV vs. NKE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LUV drawdown since its inception was -78.25%, roughly equal to the maximum NKE drawdown of -75.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUV and NKE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LUVNKEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.25%

-75.19%

-3.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.49%

-46.18%

+12.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.93%

-64.21%

+21.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.44%

-74.64%

+13.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.76%

-74.64%

+9.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.42%

-73.74%

+43.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.13%

-20.91%

-8.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.58%

23.65%

-7.07%

Volatility

LUV vs. NKE - Volatility Comparison

Southwest Airlines Co. (LUV) has a higher volatility of 10.62% compared to NIKE, Inc. (NKE) at 9.50%. This indicates that LUV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NKE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LUVNKEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.62%

9.50%

+1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.42%

29.21%

+5.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.33%

38.14%

+6.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.18%

35.80%

+2.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.63%

32.24%

+5.39%

Dividends

LUV vs. NKE - Dividend Comparison

LUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than NKE's 3.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LUV
Southwest Airlines Co.
1.73%1.74%2.14%3.12%0.00%0.00%0.39%1.30%1.30%0.73%0.75%0.66%
NKE
NIKE, Inc.
3.79%2.53%2.00%1.28%1.07%0.68%0.71%0.89%1.11%1.18%1.30%0.93%

Financials

LUV vs. NKE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Southwest Airlines Co. and NIKE, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B20222023202420252026
7.25B
11.28B
(LUV) Total Revenue
(NKE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LUV vs. NKE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Southwest Airlines Co. and NIKE, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
32.2%
40.2%
Portfolio components
LUV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Southwest Airlines Co. reported a gross profit of 2.34B and revenue of 7.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.2%.

NKE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIKE, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.53B and revenue of 11.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.2%.

LUV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Southwest Airlines Co. reported an operating income of 330.00M and revenue of 7.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.6%.

NKE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIKE, Inc. reported an operating income of 553.00M and revenue of 11.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.

LUV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Southwest Airlines Co. reported a net income of 227.00M and revenue of 7.25B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.

NKE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIKE, Inc. reported a net income of 520.00M and revenue of 11.28B, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LUV and NKE have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LUV has higher volatility (10.62%) compared to NKE (9.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LUV dropped -78.25% vs NKE's -75.19%.

LUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LUV and NKE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer