PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LUTR.L vs. TFRN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LUTR.L vs. TFRN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (LUTR.L) and WisdomTree USD Floating Rate Treasury Bond UCITS ETF - USD Acc (TFRN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LUTR.L achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly lower than TFRN.L's 1.82% return.


LUTR.L

1D
0.09%
1M
2.90%
YTD
1.10%
6M
1.71%
1Y
5.31%
3Y*
-0.41%
5Y*
-5.20%
10Y*
-1.35%

TFRN.L

1D
0.02%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.82%
6M
1.75%
1Y
4.02%
3Y*
4.68%
5Y*
3.65%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LUTR.L vs. TFRN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
LUTR.L
SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
1.10%5.45%-5.75%2.50%-28.87%-4.84%16.57%13.81%
TFRN.L
WisdomTree USD Floating Rate Treasury Bond UCITS ETF - USD Acc
1.82%4.10%5.44%4.94%2.04%-0.15%0.57%1.59%

Correlation

The correlation between LUTR.L and TFRN.L is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2019

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LUTR.L vs. TFRN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LUTR.L
LUTR.L Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
LUTR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUTR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUTR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
LUTR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUTR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

TFRN.L
TFRN.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
TFRN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFRN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFRN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
TFRN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFRN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LUTR.L vs. TFRN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (LUTR.L) and WisdomTree USD Floating Rate Treasury Bond UCITS ETF - USD Acc (TFRN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LUTR.LTFRN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.63

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.76

4.10

-3.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.91

35.75

-33.84

LUTR.L vs. TFRN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LUTR.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the TFRN.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LUTR.L and TFRN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LUTR.L vs. TFRN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LUTR.L drawdown since its inception was -46.52%, which is greater than TFRN.L's maximum drawdown of -3.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUTR.L and TFRN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LUTR.LTFRN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.52%

-3.10%

-43.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.99%

-0.98%

-6.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.72%

-0.98%

-15.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.30%

-0.98%

-39.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.30%

0.00%

-36.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.80%

-0.09%

-20.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

0.11%

+2.66%

Volatility

LUTR.L vs. TFRN.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (LUTR.L) has a higher volatility of 2.19% compared to WisdomTree USD Floating Rate Treasury Bond UCITS ETF - USD Acc (TFRN.L) at 0.14%. This indicates that LUTR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TFRN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LUTR.LTFRN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.19%

0.14%

+2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.10%

0.91%

+5.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.73%

1.92%

+6.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.93%

1.51%

+12.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.20%

1.88%

+11.32%

LUTR.L vs. TFRN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LUTR.L and TFRN.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LUTR.L vs. TFRN.L - Dividend Comparison

LUTR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, while TFRN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
LUTR.L
SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
4.54%4.40%4.22%3.13%2.56%1.72%1.91%2.42%2.49%2.61%1.14%
TFRN.L
WisdomTree USD Floating Rate Treasury Bond UCITS ETF - USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LUTR.L and TFRN.L have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LUTR.L and TFRN.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

LUTR.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 10+ Year Index, while TFRN.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and WisdomTree.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LUTR.L and TFRN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer