PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LUTR.L vs. SPY5.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LUTR.L vs. SPY5.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (LUTR.L) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPY5.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LUTR.L achieves a -1.19% return, which is significantly lower than SPY5.L's 10.31% return. Over the past 10 years, LUTR.L has underperformed SPY5.L with an annualized return of -1.02%, while SPY5.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.46% annualized return.


LUTR.L

1D
-0.47%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
-1.19%
6M
-1.45%
1Y
4.97%
3Y*
-0.81%
5Y*
-5.27%
10Y*
-1.02%

SPY5.L

1D
-0.55%
1M
4.49%
YTD
10.31%
6M
11.16%
1Y
28.27%
3Y*
22.32%
5Y*
13.71%
10Y*
15.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LUTR.L vs. SPY5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LUTR.L
SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
-1.19%5.48%-5.76%2.50%-28.88%-4.85%16.61%16.93%-1.71%8.58%
SPY5.L
State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.31%17.43%25.36%26.64%-18.68%29.28%17.52%30.85%-5.09%22.58%

Correlation

The correlation between LUTR.L and SPY5.L is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2016

-0.12

The correlation between LUTR.L and SPY5.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (all time) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LUTR.L vs. SPY5.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LUTR.L
LUTR.L Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
LUTR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUTR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUTR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
LUTR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUTR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY5.L
SPY5.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SPY5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LUTR.L vs. SPY5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (LUTR.L) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPY5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LUTR.LSPY5.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.44

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.71

3.44

-2.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.89

14.88

-12.98

LUTR.L vs. SPY5.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LUTR.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the SPY5.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LUTR.L and SPY5.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LUTR.LSPY5.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

2.43

-1.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.38

0.86

-1.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.08

0.95

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.06

0.95

-1.01

Drawdowns

LUTR.L vs. SPY5.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LUTR.L drawdown since its inception was -46.52%, which is greater than SPY5.L's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUTR.L and SPY5.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LUTR.LSPY5.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.52%

-33.89%

-12.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.01%

-8.18%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.06%

-18.37%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.30%

-24.37%

-15.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.52%

-33.89%

-12.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.75%

-0.55%

-37.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.79%

-3.70%

-17.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

1.90%

+0.72%

Volatility

LUTR.L vs. SPY5.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (LUTR.L) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPY5.L) have volatilities of 3.27% and 3.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LUTR.LSPY5.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.27%

3.17%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.15%

8.49%

-2.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.85%

11.63%

-2.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.94%

15.92%

-1.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.27%

16.24%

-2.97%

LUTR.L vs. SPY5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LUTR.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY5.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LUTR.L vs. SPY5.L - Dividend Comparison

LUTR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, more than SPY5.L's 0.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LUTR.L
SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
4.64%4.40%4.22%3.13%2.56%1.72%1.91%3.60%2.49%2.61%1.14%0.00%
SPY5.L
State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.89%0.97%1.06%1.19%1.40%0.99%1.28%1.71%2.20%2.29%1.64%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


LUTR.L and SPY5.L have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPY5.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPY5.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for LUTR.L.

LUTR.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while SPY5.L is S&P 500. LUTR.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 10+ Year Index, while SPY5.L tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for LUTR.L and 0.09% for SPY5.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LUTR.L and SPY5.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer