PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LUTR.L vs. VDST.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LUTR.L vs. VDST.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (LUTR.L) and Vanguard U.S. Treasury 0-1 Year Bond UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VDST.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LUTR.L achieves a -1.19% return, which is significantly lower than VDST.L's 1.42% return.


LUTR.L

1D
-0.47%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
-1.19%
6M
-1.45%
1Y
4.97%
3Y*
-0.81%
5Y*
-5.27%
10Y*
-1.02%

VDST.L

1D
0.01%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.42%
6M
1.74%
1Y
3.94%
3Y*
4.70%
5Y*
3.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LUTR.L vs. VDST.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LUTR.L
SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
-1.19%5.48%-5.76%2.50%-28.88%-4.85%-2.45%
VDST.L
Vanguard U.S. Treasury 0-1 Year Bond UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
1.42%4.26%5.24%4.98%0.95%0.01%0.03%

Correlation

The correlation between LUTR.L and VDST.L is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2020

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LUTR.L vs. VDST.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LUTR.L
LUTR.L Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
LUTR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUTR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUTR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
LUTR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUTR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

VDST.L
VDST.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
VDST.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDST.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDST.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
VDST.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDST.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LUTR.L vs. VDST.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (LUTR.L) and Vanguard U.S. Treasury 0-1 Year Bond UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VDST.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LUTR.LVDST.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-8.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-21.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

4.86

-3.77

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.71

35.91

-35.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.89

243.54

-241.65

LUTR.L vs. VDST.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LUTR.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the VDST.L Sharpe Ratio of 9.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LUTR.L and VDST.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LUTR.LVDST.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

9.29

-8.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.38

8.03

-8.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.06

7.82

-7.88

Drawdowns

LUTR.L vs. VDST.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LUTR.L drawdown since its inception was -46.52%, which is greater than VDST.L's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUTR.L and VDST.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LUTR.LVDST.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.52%

-0.36%

-46.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.01%

-0.11%

-6.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.06%

-0.15%

-16.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.30%

-0.36%

-39.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.75%

-0.01%

-37.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.79%

-0.03%

-20.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

0.02%

+2.60%

Volatility

LUTR.L vs. VDST.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (LUTR.L) has a higher volatility of 3.27% compared to Vanguard U.S. Treasury 0-1 Year Bond UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VDST.L) at 0.12%. This indicates that LUTR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDST.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LUTR.LVDST.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.27%

0.12%

+3.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.15%

0.33%

+5.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.85%

0.42%

+8.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.94%

0.47%

+13.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.27%

0.46%

+12.81%

LUTR.L vs. VDST.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LUTR.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VDST.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LUTR.L vs. VDST.L - Dividend Comparison

LUTR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, while VDST.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
LUTR.L
SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
4.64%4.40%4.22%3.13%2.56%1.72%1.91%3.60%2.49%2.61%1.14%
VDST.L
Vanguard U.S. Treasury 0-1 Year Bond UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LUTR.L and VDST.L have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VDST.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VDST.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for LUTR.L.

LUTR.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 10+ Year Index, while VDST.L tracks Bloomberg Short Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for LUTR.L and 0.05% for VDST.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LUTR.L and VDST.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer