LUNR vs. ATO.PA
LUNR (Intuitive Machines Inc. ) and ATO.PA (Atos SE) are both stocks. LUNR operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while ATO.PA operates in Information Technology Services (Technology). Over the past 3 years, LUNR returned 42.24%/yr vs -66.90%/yr for ATO.PA. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LUNR vs. ATO.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LUNR is traded in USD, while ATO.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ATO.PA values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LUNR achieves a 64.02% return, which is significantly higher than ATO.PA's -31.93% return.
LUNR
- 1D
- -13.12%
- 1M
- -25.39%
- YTD
- 64.02%
- 6M
- 122.39%
- 1Y
- 144.44%
- 3Y*
- 42.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ATO.PA
- 1D
- 2.43%
- 1M
- -8.19%
- YTD
- -31.93%
- 6M
- -38.17%
- 1Y
- -11.18%
- 3Y*
- -66.90%
- 5Y*
- -61.75%
- 10Y*
- -38.00%
LUNR vs. ATO.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LUNR Intuitive Machines Inc. | 64.02% | -10.63% | 610.76% | -74.45% | 3.73% | -0.10% |
ATO.PA Atos SE | -31.93% | 118.88% | -95.34% | -19.30% | -77.35% | -8.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between LUNR and ATO.PA is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LUNR vs. ATO.PA — Risk / Return Rank
LUNR
ATO.PA
LUNR vs. ATO.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) and Atos SE (ATO.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LUNR | ATO.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.02 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.47 | -0.23 | +3.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.12 | -0.42 | +7.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LUNR vs. ATO.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LUNR drawdown since its inception was -97.43%, roughly equal to the maximum ATO.PA drawdown of -99.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUNR and ATO.PA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LUNR | ATO.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.43% | -99.86% | +2.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.94% | -47.80% | +5.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.54% | -99.00% | +20.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -99.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.53% | -99.55% | +32.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.21% | -40.06% | -23.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.37% | 26.39% | -6.02% |
Volatility
LUNR vs. ATO.PA - Volatility Comparison
Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) has a higher volatility of 42.95% compared to Atos SE (ATO.PA) at 15.93%. This indicates that LUNR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATO.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LUNR | ATO.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 42.95% | 15.93% | +27.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 93.42% | 43.23% | +50.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 111.16% | 60.68% | +50.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 171.29% | 127.66% | +43.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 171.29% | 93.35% | +77.94% |
Dividends
LUNR vs. ATO.PA - Dividend Comparison
Neither LUNR nor ATO.PA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
LUNR vs. ATO.PA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Intuitive Machines Inc. and Atos SE. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LUNR and ATO.PA have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for LUNR and ATO.PA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer