LUNMF vs. LUN.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Lundin Mining Corporation (LUNMF) and Lundin Mining Corporation (LUN.TO).
Performance
LUNMF vs. LUN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LUNMF vs. LUN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LUNMF Lundin Mining Corporation | 15.86% | 152.20% | 8.32% | 39.33% | -16.84% | -9.83% | 52.63% | 48.16% | -36.95% | 39.90% |
LUN.TO Lundin Mining Corporation | 16.19% | 152.88% | 8.43% | 38.76% | -17.64% | -8.67% | 52.10% | 47.12% | -36.73% | 41.83% |
Different Trading Currencies
LUNMF is traded in USD, while LUN.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the LUN.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
LUNMF:
$21.32B
LUN.TO:
CA$29.69B
LUNMF:
$1.51
LUN.TO:
CA$1.51
LUNMF:
16.53
LUN.TO:
23.02
LUNMF:
0.01
LUN.TO:
0.14
LUNMF:
5.56
LUN.TO:
7.75
LUNMF:
3.23
LUN.TO:
4.49
LUNMF:
$3.84B
LUN.TO:
CA$3.84B
LUNMF:
$1.16B
LUN.TO:
CA$1.46B
LUNMF:
$1.71B
LUN.TO:
CA$1.72B
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LUNMF having a 15.86% return and LUN.TO slightly higher at 16.19%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LUNMF having a 26.09% annualized return and LUN.TO not far behind at 26.01%.
LUNMF
- 1D
- 11.01%
- 1M
- -21.89%
- YTD
- 15.86%
- 6M
- 66.88%
- 1Y
- 205.39%
- 3Y*
- 57.98%
- 5Y*
- 22.43%
- 10Y*
- 26.09%
LUN.TO
- 1D
- 10.84%
- 1M
- -21.59%
- YTD
- 16.19%
- 6M
- 67.64%
- 1Y
- 209.57%
- 3Y*
- 58.04%
- 5Y*
- 22.49%
- 10Y*
- 26.01%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LUNMF vs. LUN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
LUNMF
LUN.TO
LUNMF vs. LUN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lundin Mining Corporation (LUNMF) and Lundin Mining Corporation (LUN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LUNMF | LUN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.73 | 3.84 | -0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.66 | 3.72 | -0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.51 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.98 | 5.96 | +0.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.38 | 23.78 | -0.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LUNMF | LUN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.73 | 3.84 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.47 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.54 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.50 | -0.50 |
Correlation
The correlation between LUNMF and LUN.TO is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LUNMF vs. LUN.TO - Dividend Comparison
LUNMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than LUN.TO's 0.32% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LUNMF Lundin Mining Corporation | 0.16% | 0.39% | 3.82% | 3.51% | 5.96% | 4.01% | 1.34% | 1.52% | 2.22% | 1.38% |
LUN.TO Lundin Mining Corporation | 0.32% | 0.59% | 3.64% | 3.32% | 5.66% | 3.95% | 1.42% | 1.55% | 2.13% | 1.44% |
Drawdowns
LUNMF vs. LUN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LUNMF drawdown since its inception was -98.55%, which is greater than LUN.TO's maximum drawdown of -78.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUNMF and LUN.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LUNMF | LUN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.55% | -95.33% | -3.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.47% | -33.67% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.81% | -57.61% | -4.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.92% | -57.61% | -4.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.24% | -21.82% | -1.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -80.87% | -48.47% | -32.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.56% | 8.41% | +0.15% |
Volatility
LUNMF vs. LUN.TO - Volatility Comparison
Lundin Mining Corporation (LUNMF) and Lundin Mining Corporation (LUN.TO) have volatilities of 22.24% and 22.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LUNMF | LUN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.24% | 22.34% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.15% | 41.61% | +0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.54% | 55.00% | +0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.54% | 48.16% | +0.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.05% | 48.75% | +0.30% |
Financials
LUNMF vs. LUN.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lundin Mining Corporation and Lundin Mining Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LUNMF vs. LUN.TO - Profitability Comparison
LUNMF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported a gross profit of 291.61M and revenue of 989.48M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.5%.
LUN.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported a gross profit of 291.61M and revenue of 989.48M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.5%.
LUNMF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported an operating income of 278.62M and revenue of 989.48M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.2%.
LUN.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported an operating income of 278.62M and revenue of 989.48M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.2%.
LUNMF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported a net income of 779.09M and revenue of 989.48M, resulting in a net margin of 78.7%.
LUN.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported a net income of 779.09M and revenue of 989.48M, resulting in a net margin of 78.7%.