LUNMF vs. AGI
LUNMF (Lundin Mining Corporation) and AGI (Alamos Gold Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — LUNMF in Copper, AGI in Gold. Over the past 10 years, LUNMF returned 22.39%/yr vs 12.25%/yr for AGI. Their 0.33 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LUNMF vs. AGI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LUNMF achieves a 15.15% return, which is significantly higher than AGI's -27.72% return. Over the past 10 years, LUNMF has outperformed AGI with an annualized return of 22.39%, while AGI has yielded a comparatively lower 12.25% annualized return.
LUNMF
- 1D
- -2.45%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- 6M
- -1.78%
- YTD
- 15.15%
- 1Y
- 145.27%
- 3Y*
- 43.92%
- 5Y*
- 26.04%
- 10Y*
- 22.39%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.57%
AGI
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- -11.87%
- 6M
- -24.43%
- YTD
- -27.72%
- 1Y
- 12.29%
- 3Y*
- 33.49%
- 5Y*
- 28.93%
- 10Y*
- 12.25%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $133.64M | $126.71M | $144.32M | |
| $2.21M | $4.87M | $4.25M |
LUNMF vs. AGI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LUNMF Lundin Mining Corporation | 15.15% | 152.20% | 8.32% | 39.33% | -16.84% | -9.83% | 52.63% | 48.16% | -36.95% | 39.90% |
AGI Alamos Gold Inc. | -27.72% | 109.93% | 37.72% | 34.33% | 33.11% | -11.00% | 46.75% | 68.42% | -44.49% | -4.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between LUNMF and AGI is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2006 | 0.33 |
Over the past year, LUNMF and AGI have become more correlated (0.55) than their long-term average of 0.33, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
LUNMF:
$21.20B
AGI:
$11.69B
LUNMF:
$1.69
AGI:
$2.76
LUNMF:
14.64
AGI:
10.07
LUNMF:
0.01
AGI:
0.07
LUNMF:
5.26
AGI:
5.32
LUNMF:
3.11
AGI:
2.44
LUNMF:
$4.04B
AGI:
$2.21B
LUNMF:
$1.39B
AGI:
$1.33B
LUNMF:
$1.92B
AGI:
$1.75B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LUNMF vs. AGI — Risk / Return Rank
LUNMF
AGI
LUNMF vs. AGI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lundin Mining Corporation (LUNMF) and Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LUNMF | AGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.09 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.29 | 0.30 | +3.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.67 | 0.70 | +9.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LUNMF vs. AGI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LUNMF drawdown since its inception was -98.55%, which is greater than AGI's maximum drawdown of -88.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUNMF and AGI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LUNMF | AGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.55% | -88.13% | -10.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.47% | -49.60% | +16.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.67% | -49.60% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.67% | -49.60% | -8.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.92% | -67.81% | +5.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.71% | -49.60% | +25.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -79.78% | -37.77% | -42.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.45% | 21.26% | -7.81% |
Volatility
LUNMF vs. AGI - Volatility Comparison
Lundin Mining Corporation (LUNMF) has a higher volatility of 15.18% compared to Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI) at 11.71%. This indicates that LUNMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LUNMF | AGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.18% | 11.71% | +3.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.84% | 44.49% | +2.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.19% | 54.01% | +3.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.63% | 41.86% | +7.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.21% | 48.43% | +0.78% |
Dividends
LUNMF vs. AGI - Dividend Comparison
LUNMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than AGI's 0.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGI Alamos Gold Inc. | 0.47% | 0.26% | 0.54% | 0.74% | 0.99% | 1.30% | 0.74% | 0.66% | 0.56% | 0.31% | 0.29% | 1.22% |
LUNMF Lundin Mining Corporation | 0.22% | 0.39% | 3.82% | 3.51% | 5.96% | 4.01% | 1.34% | 1.52% | 2.22% | 1.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LUNMF vs. AGI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lundin Mining Corporation and Alamos Gold Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LUNMF vs. AGI - Profitability Comparison
LUNMF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported a gross profit of 537.50M and revenue of 1.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.4%.
AGI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported a gross profit of 342.96M and revenue of 579.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.2%.
LUNMF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported an operating income of 503.80M and revenue of 1.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 43.5%.
AGI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported an operating income of 345.99M and revenue of 579.01M, resulting in an operating margin of 59.8%.
LUNMF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported a net income of 281.40M and revenue of 1.16B, resulting in a net margin of 24.3%.
AGI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported a net income of 263.53M and revenue of 579.01M, resulting in a net margin of 45.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LUNMF and AGI have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LUNMF has higher volatility (15.18%) compared to AGI (11.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LUNMF dropped -98.55% vs AGI's -88.13%.
LUNMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LUNMF and AGI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer