PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LUNL vs. QTAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LUNL vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LUNR ETF (LUNL) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


LUNL

1D
-29.16%
1M
44.32%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QTAP

1D
-0.10%
1M
2.89%
YTD
14.67%
6M
15.56%
1Y
25.59%
3Y*
21.18%
5Y*
13.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LUNL vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LUNL and QTAP is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LUNL vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LUNL

QTAP
QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LUNL vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LUNR ETF (LUNL) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LUNL vs. QTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LUNLQTAPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.16

0.75

+0.41

Drawdowns

LUNL vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LUNL drawdown since its inception was -64.22%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUNL and QTAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LUNLQTAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.22%

-29.44%

-34.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.02%

-0.10%

-47.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.14%

-5.04%

-27.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.32%

Volatility

LUNL vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LUNLQTAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

258.78%

5.56%

+253.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

258.78%

18.89%

+239.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

258.78%

18.77%

+240.01%

LUNL vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

LUNL has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

LUNL vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison

Neither LUNL nor QTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LUNL and QTAP have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for LUNL.

LUNL and QTAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for LUNL and 0.79% for QTAP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LUNL and QTAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer