PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IPO.TO vs. FRU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

IPO.TO vs. FRU.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about InPlay Oil Corp. (IPO.TO) and Freehold Royalties Ltd. (FRU.TO).

Performance

IPO.TO vs. FRU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in InPlay Oil Corp. (IPO.TO) and Freehold Royalties Ltd. (FRU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IPO.TO vs. FRU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IPO.TO
InPlay Oil Corp.		48.96%32.50%-14.79%-21.88%40.32%847.83%-65.15%-32.65%-49.48%-2.51%
FRU.TO
Freehold Royalties Ltd.		15.56%28.81%0.98%-6.86%45.15%135.56%-23.25%-4.51%-37.74%3.37%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IPO.TO:

CA$505.61M

FRU.TO:

CA$2.85B

EPS

IPO.TO:

-CA$0.28

FRU.TO:

CA$0.56

PS Ratio

IPO.TO:

1.78

FRU.TO:

9.10

PB Ratio

IPO.TO:

1.37

FRU.TO:

2.85

Total Revenue (TTM)

IPO.TO:

CA$280.83M

FRU.TO:

CA$313.46M

Gross Profit (TTM)

IPO.TO:

CA$117.24M

FRU.TO:

CA$193.18M

EBITDA (TTM)

IPO.TO:

CA$103.73M

FRU.TO:

CA$258.03M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPO.TO achieves a 48.96% return, which is significantly higher than FRU.TO's 15.56% return. Over the past 10 years, IPO.TO has outperformed FRU.TO with an annualized return of 100.13%, while FRU.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.33% annualized return.

IPO.TO

1D
0.67%
1M
18.05%
YTD
48.96%
6M
49.99%
1Y
106.52%
3Y*
13.35%
5Y*
49.96%
10Y*
100.13%

FRU.TO

1D
-0.23%
1M
-1.25%
YTD
15.56%
6M
29.74%
1Y
46.30%
3Y*
14.44%
5Y*
26.83%
10Y*
12.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

InPlay Oil Corp.

Freehold Royalties Ltd.

Often compared with IPO.TO:
IPO.TO vs. ALV.VIPO.TO vs. LUN.TOIPO.TO vs. SRU-UN.TOIPO.TO vs. BBD-B.TOIPO.TO vs. WCP.TO
Often compared with FRU.TO:
FRU.TO vs. CNQ.TOFRU.TO vs. ATD.TOFRU.TO vs. ALA.TOFRU.TO vs. BIR.TOFRU.TO vs. POW.TOFRU.TO vs. ARCCFRU.TO vs. FIE.TO

Return for Risk

IPO.TO vs. FRU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IPO.TO
IPO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
IPO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
IPO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
FRU.TO
FRU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FRU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FRU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPO.TO vs. FRU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InPlay Oil Corp. (IPO.TO) and Freehold Royalties Ltd. (FRU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IPO.TOFRU.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.76

1.91

+0.85

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.25

2.32

+0.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.37

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

2.90

+0.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.93

11.65

+0.28

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IPO.TO vs. FRU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPO.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is higher than the FRU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPO.TO and FRU.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IPO.TOFRU.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.76

1.91

+0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

0.91

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

0.35

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

0.40

-0.40

Correlation

The correlation between IPO.TO and FRU.TO is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

IPO.TO vs. FRU.TO - Dividend Comparison

IPO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.95%, more than FRU.TO's 5.70% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IPO.TO
InPlay Oil Corp.		5.95%8.71%10.40%8.14%0.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FRU.TO
Freehold Royalties Ltd.		5.70%7.11%8.44%7.89%6.13%4.21%5.74%8.72%7.62%4.13%3.81%9.21%

Drawdowns

IPO.TO vs. FRU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPO.TO drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than FRU.TO's maximum drawdown of -86.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPO.TO and FRU.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

IPO.TOFRU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-86.93%

-13.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.04%

-15.89%

-16.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.62%

-28.41%

-44.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-97.78%

-81.39%

-16.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-94.82%

-3.34%

-91.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-92.37%

-22.80%

-69.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.03%

3.95%

+5.08%

Volatility

IPO.TO vs. FRU.TO - Volatility Comparison

InPlay Oil Corp. (IPO.TO) has a higher volatility of 10.31% compared to Freehold Royalties Ltd. (FRU.TO) at 6.68%. This indicates that IPO.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

IPO.TOFRU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.31%

6.68%

+3.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.91%

14.16%

+8.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.87%

24.37%

+14.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.91%

29.60%

+21.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40,411.82%

35.64%

+40,376.18%

Financials

IPO.TO vs. FRU.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between InPlay Oil Corp. and Freehold Royalties Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

20.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M100.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
70.91M
69.76M
(IPO.TO) Total Revenue
(FRU.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

IPO.TO vs. FRU.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between InPlay Oil Corp. and Freehold Royalties Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual
10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
10.6%
57.1%
Portfolio components
IPO.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, InPlay Oil Corp. reported a gross profit of 7.52M and revenue of 70.91M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.6%.

FRU.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Freehold Royalties Ltd. reported a gross profit of 39.81M and revenue of 69.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.1%.

IPO.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, InPlay Oil Corp. reported an operating income of 2.23M and revenue of 70.91M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.1%.

FRU.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Freehold Royalties Ltd. reported an operating income of 30.80M and revenue of 69.76M, resulting in an operating margin of 44.2%.

IPO.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, InPlay Oil Corp. reported a net income of 3.04M and revenue of 70.91M, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.

FRU.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Freehold Royalties Ltd. reported a net income of 14.08M and revenue of 69.76M, resulting in a net margin of 20.2%.