LULU vs. PDBC

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

LULU (Lululemon Athletica Inc.) is a stock, while PDBC (Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) is Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco. Over the past 10 years, LULU returned 4.33%/yr vs 8.21%/yr for PDBC. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LULU vs. PDBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LULU achieves a -42.84% return, which is significantly lower than PDBC's 28.00% return. Over the past 10 years, LULU has underperformed PDBC with an annualized return of 4.33%, while PDBC has yielded a comparatively higher 8.21% annualized return.

LULU

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: 2.85%
• 6M: -42.06%
• YTD: -42.84%
• 1Y: -47.46%
• 3Y*: -32.35%
• 5Y*: -20.40%
• 10Y*: 4.33%

PDBC

• 1D: -1.22%
• 1M: 1.74%
• 6M: 23.17%
• YTD: 28.00%
• 1Y: 32.27%
• 3Y*: 10.94%
• 5Y*: 11.05%
• 10Y*: 8.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LULU vs. PDBC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc.	-42.84%	-45.66%	-25.21%	59.59%	-18.16%	12.48%	50.23%	90.50%	54.74%	20.93%
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	28.00%	5.96%	2.09%	-6.25%	19.23%	41.72%	-7.84%	11.44%	-12.78%	5.06%

Correlation

The correlation between LULU and PDBC is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.05
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.03
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2014	0.08

The correlation between LULU and PDBC shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LULU vs. PDBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LULU

LULU Risk / Return Rank: 6
LULU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
LULU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
LULU Omega Ratio Rank: 7
LULU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
LULU Martin Ratio Rank: 5

PDBC

PDBC Risk / Return Rank: 57
PDBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
PDBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
PDBC Omega Ratio Rank: 59
PDBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
PDBC Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LULU vs. PDBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LULU	PDBC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.06	1.71	-2.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.49	2.33	-3.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.81	1.29	-0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.87	1.96	-2.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.56	6.73	-8.29

LULU vs. PDBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LULU Sharpe Ratio is -1.06, which is lower than the PDBC Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LULU and PDBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LULU vs. PDBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LULU drawdown since its inception was -92.26%, which is greater than PDBC's maximum drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LULU and PDBC.

Drawdown Indicators

	LULU	PDBC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.26%	-49.52%	-42.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-54.81%	-16.55%	-38.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-79.38%	-16.55%	-62.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-79.38%	-27.63%	-51.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-79.38%	-40.73%	-38.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-76.77%	-10.31%	-66.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.84%	-23.09%	-4.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.55%	4.80%	+25.75%

Volatility

LULU vs. PDBC - Volatility Comparison

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) has a higher volatility of 11.95% compared to Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) at 6.25%. This indicates that LULU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LULU	PDBC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.95%	6.25%	+5.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.53%	16.80%	+15.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.07%	18.91%	+26.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.49%	19.24%	+23.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.75%	17.76%	+22.99%

Dividends

LULU vs. PDBC - Dividend Comparison

LULU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PDBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	3.00%	3.84%	4.42%	4.21%	13.05%	50.83%	0.01%	1.40%	1.00%	3.83%	6.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LULU and PDBC in my portfolio?

LULU and PDBC have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LULU or PDBC?

LULU has higher volatility (11.95%) compared to PDBC (6.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LULU dropped -92.26% vs PDBC's -49.52%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PDBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.