LULU vs. EPR
LULU (Lululemon Athletica Inc.) and EPR (EPR Properties) are both stocks. LULU operates in Apparel Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while EPR operates in REIT - Retail (Real Estate). Over the past 10 years, LULU returned 5.37%/yr vs 3.90%/yr for EPR. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LULU vs. EPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LULU achieves a -42.85% return, which is significantly lower than EPR's 23.29% return. Over the past 10 years, LULU has outperformed EPR with an annualized return of 5.37%, while EPR has yielded a comparatively lower 3.90% annualized return.
LULU
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- -1.89%
- YTD
- -42.85%
- 6M
- -42.05%
- 1Y
- -50.33%
- 3Y*
- -31.43%
- 5Y*
- -18.89%
- 10Y*
- 5.37%
EPR
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- 3.94%
- YTD
- 23.29%
- 6M
- 23.59%
- 1Y
- 13.06%
- 3Y*
- 17.65%
- 5Y*
- 9.64%
- 10Y*
- 3.90%
LULU vs. EPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc. | -42.85% | -45.66% | -25.21% | 59.59% | -18.16% | 12.48% | 50.23% | 90.50% | 54.74% | 20.93% |
EPR EPR Properties | 23.29% | 20.52% | -1.25% | 38.83% | -14.61% | 50.60% | -52.09% | 17.13% | 3.59% | -3.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between LULU and EPR is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2007 | 0.30 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LULU and EPR has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.30, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
LULU:
$13.72B
EPR:
$4.58B
LULU:
$12.35
EPR:
$3.55
LULU:
9.62
EPR:
16.86
LULU:
0.47
EPR:
0.36
LULU:
1.25
EPR:
6.54
LULU:
2.73
EPR:
1.98
LULU:
$11.20B
EPR:
$700.22M
LULU:
$6.24B
EPR:
$568.77M
LULU:
$2.44B
EPR:
$582.57M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LULU vs. EPR — Risk / Return Rank
LULU
EPR
LULU vs. EPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) and EPR Properties (EPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LULU | EPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 1.10 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | 0.58 | -1.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.72 | 1.15 | -2.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LULU vs. EPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LULU drawdown since its inception was -92.26%, which is greater than EPR's maximum drawdown of -82.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LULU and EPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LULU | EPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.26% | -82.02% | -10.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.88% | -19.51% | -34.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -77.66% | -19.51% | -58.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.66% | -35.63% | -42.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.66% | -82.02% | +4.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.77% | 0.00% | -76.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.61% | -16.58% | -11.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.26% | 9.81% | +20.45% |
Volatility
LULU vs. EPR - Volatility Comparison
Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) has a higher volatility of 13.47% compared to EPR Properties (EPR) at 5.14%. This indicates that LULU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LULU | EPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.47% | 5.14% | +8.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.76% | 16.49% | +16.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.48% | 22.44% | +22.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.22% | 26.16% | +16.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.62% | 42.44% | -1.82% |
Dividends
LULU vs. EPR - Dividend Comparison
LULU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPR EPR Properties | 5.99% | 7.05% | 7.68% | 6.81% | 8.62% | 3.16% | 4.66% | 6.37% | 5.62% | 6.23% | 5.35% | 6.21% |
LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LULU vs. EPR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lululemon Athletica Inc. and EPR Properties. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LULU vs. EPR - Profitability Comparison
LULU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.34B and revenue of 2.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.2%.
EPR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EPR Properties reported a gross profit of 180.96M and revenue of 181.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.8%.
LULU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported an operating income of 276.95M and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.
EPR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EPR Properties reported an operating income of 100.62M and revenue of 181.25M, resulting in an operating margin of 55.5%.
LULU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a net income of 195.05M and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in a net margin of 7.9%.
EPR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EPR Properties reported a net income of 62.61M and revenue of 181.25M, resulting in a net margin of 34.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LULU and EPR have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LULU has higher volatility (13.47%) compared to EPR (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LULU dropped -92.26% vs EPR's -82.02%.
EPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.50 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LULU and EPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer