PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LUG.TO vs. VRNA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LUG.TO vs. VRNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) and Verona Pharma plc (VRNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LUG.TO is traded in CAD, while VRNA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VRNA values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


LUG.TO

1D
0.42%
1M
-13.90%
YTD
-26.55%
6M
-23.60%
1Y
20.17%
3Y*
78.91%
5Y*
53.88%
10Y*
32.96%

VRNA

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LUG.TO vs. VRNA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LUG.TO
Lundin Gold Inc.
-26.55%291.22%91.60%29.55%30.60%-4.67%31.21%66.93%10.15%-23.61%
VRNA
Verona Pharma plc
0.00%123.73%153.38%-25.73%313.48%-4.05%18.85%-42.87%-11.87%-18.87%

Correlation

The correlation between LUG.TO and VRNA is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2017

0.09

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LUG.TO:

CA$19.02B

VRNA:

$9.72B

EPS

LUG.TO:

CA$3.77

VRNA:

-$0.69

PS Ratio

LUG.TO:

9.50

VRNA:

57.97

PB Ratio

LUG.TO:

13.96

VRNA:

34.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

LUG.TO:

CA$2.00B

VRNA:

$167.65M

Gross Profit (TTM)

LUG.TO:

CA$1.41B

VRNA:

$159.52M

EBITDA (TTM)

LUG.TO:

CA$1.43B

VRNA:

-$40.86M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LUG.TO vs. VRNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LUG.TO
LUG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
LUG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
LUG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

VRNA
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LUG.TO vs. VRNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) and Verona Pharma plc (VRNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LUG.TOVRNADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.50

LUG.TO vs. VRNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LUG.TOVRNADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

Drawdowns

LUG.TO vs. VRNA - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LUG.TOVRNADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.50%

Volatility

LUG.TO vs. VRNA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LUG.TOVRNADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.39%

Dividends

LUG.TO vs. VRNA - Dividend Comparison

LUG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.30%, while VRNA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
LUG.TO
Lundin Gold Inc.
5.30%3.35%2.69%3.26%1.97%
VRNA
Verona Pharma plc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LUG.TO vs. VRNA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lundin Gold Inc. and Verona Pharma plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M20222023202420252026
567.38M
75.14M
(LUG.TO) Total Revenue
(VRNA) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. LUG.TO values in CAD, VRNA values in USD

LUG.TO vs. VRNA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lundin Gold Inc. and Verona Pharma plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
74.2%
95.4%
Portfolio components
LUG.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported a gross profit of 420.70M and revenue of 567.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.2%.

VRNA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Verona Pharma plc reported a gross profit of 71.68M and revenue of 75.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.4%.

LUG.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported an operating income of 391.03M and revenue of 567.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 68.9%.

VRNA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Verona Pharma plc reported an operating income of 9.69M and revenue of 75.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.9%.

LUG.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported a net income of 273.33M and revenue of 567.38M, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.

VRNA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Verona Pharma plc reported a net income of 8.69M and revenue of 75.14M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LUG.TO and VRNA have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LUG.TO and VRNA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer