PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LUG.TO vs. SMCI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LUG.TO vs. SMCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) and Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LUG.TO is traded in CAD, while SMCI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SMCI values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LUG.TO achieves a -26.55% return, which is significantly lower than SMCI's 53.03% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LUG.TO having a 32.96% annualized return and SMCI not far ahead at 34.02%.


LUG.TO

1D
0.42%
1M
-13.90%
YTD
-26.55%
6M
-23.60%
1Y
20.17%
3Y*
78.91%
5Y*
53.88%
10Y*
32.96%

SMCI

1D
5.94%
1M
26.95%
YTD
53.03%
6M
25.36%
1Y
8.02%
3Y*
20.61%
5Y*
69.40%
10Y*
34.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LUG.TO vs. SMCI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LUG.TO
Lundin Gold Inc.
-26.55%291.22%91.60%29.55%30.60%-4.67%31.21%66.93%10.15%-13.88%
SMCI
Super Micro Computer, Inc.
53.03%-8.35%16.30%238.00%98.64%38.75%28.68%66.88%-28.52%-30.44%

Correlation

The correlation between LUG.TO and SMCI is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2007

0.07

The correlation between LUG.TO and SMCI shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LUG.TO:

CA$19.02B

SMCI:

$29.63B

EPS

LUG.TO:

CA$3.77

SMCI:

$2.70

PE Ratio

LUG.TO:

20.77

SMCI:

16.27

PEG Ratio

LUG.TO:

0.28

SMCI:

0.36

PS Ratio

LUG.TO:

9.50

SMCI:

0.86

PB Ratio

LUG.TO:

13.96

SMCI:

3.91

Total Revenue (TTM)

LUG.TO:

CA$2.00B

SMCI:

$33.70B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LUG.TO:

CA$1.41B

SMCI:

$2.83B

EBITDA (TTM)

LUG.TO:

CA$1.43B

SMCI:

$1.47B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LUG.TO vs. SMCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LUG.TO
LUG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
LUG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
LUG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

SMCI
SMCI Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SMCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMCI Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SMCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMCI Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LUG.TO vs. SMCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) and Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LUG.TOSMCIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.10

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

0.12

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.50

0.21

+1.29

LUG.TO vs. SMCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LUG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is higher than the SMCI Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LUG.TO and SMCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LUG.TOSMCIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

0.10

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.17

0.81

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.48

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.38

-0.26

Drawdowns

LUG.TO vs. SMCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LUG.TO drawdown since its inception was -94.74%, which is greater than SMCI's maximum drawdown of -84.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUG.TO and SMCI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LUG.TOSMCIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.74%

-84.28%

-10.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.14%

-66.28%

+31.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.14%

-84.28%

+49.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.94%

-84.28%

+45.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.84%

-84.28%

+42.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.86%

-61.74%

+26.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.65%

-30.78%

-36.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.50%

38.84%

-25.34%

Volatility

LUG.TO vs. SMCI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) is 17.75%, while Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI) has a volatility of 26.31%. This indicates that LUG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LUG.TOSMCIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.75%

26.31%

-8.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.85%

67.75%

-25.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.10%

79.83%

-23.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.53%

85.69%

-39.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.39%

70.81%

-27.42%

Dividends

LUG.TO vs. SMCI - Dividend Comparison

LUG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.30%, while SMCI has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
LUG.TO
Lundin Gold Inc.
5.30%3.35%2.69%3.26%1.97%
SMCI
Super Micro Computer, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LUG.TO vs. SMCI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lundin Gold Inc. and Super Micro Computer, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
567.38M
10.24B
(LUG.TO) Total Revenue
(SMCI) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. LUG.TO values in CAD, SMCI values in USD

LUG.TO vs. SMCI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lundin Gold Inc. and Super Micro Computer, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
74.2%
10.0%
Portfolio components
LUG.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported a gross profit of 420.70M and revenue of 567.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.2%.

SMCI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Super Micro Computer, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.02B and revenue of 10.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.0%.

LUG.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported an operating income of 391.03M and revenue of 567.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 68.9%.

SMCI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Super Micro Computer, Inc. reported an operating income of 625.87M and revenue of 10.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.1%.

LUG.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported a net income of 273.33M and revenue of 567.38M, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.

SMCI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Super Micro Computer, Inc. reported a net income of 1.02B and revenue of 10.24B, resulting in a net margin of 9.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LUG.TO and SMCI have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LUG.TO and SMCI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer