LUG.TO vs. HIMS
LUG.TO (Lundin Gold Inc.) and HIMS (Hims & Hers Health, Inc.) are both stocks. LUG.TO operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while HIMS operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, LUG.TO returned 53.88%/yr vs 18.39%/yr for HIMS. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LUG.TO vs. HIMS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LUG.TO is traded in CAD, while HIMS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HIMS values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LUG.TO achieves a -26.55% return, which is significantly lower than HIMS's -14.80% return.
LUG.TO
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -13.90%
- YTD
- -26.55%
- 6M
- -23.60%
- 1Y
- 20.17%
- 3Y*
- 78.91%
- 5Y*
- 53.88%
- 10Y*
- 32.96%
HIMS
- 1D
- 4.03%
- 1M
- -1.90%
- YTD
- -14.80%
- 6M
- -30.00%
- 1Y
- -50.79%
- 3Y*
- 46.60%
- 5Y*
- 18.39%
- 10Y*
- —
LUG.TO vs. HIMS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LUG.TO Lundin Gold Inc. | -26.55% | 291.22% | 91.60% | 29.55% | 30.60% | -4.67% | 31.21% | 3.22% |
HIMS Hims & Hers Health, Inc. | -14.80% | 28.15% | 194.69% | 35.54% | 4.06% | -55.16% | 43.98% | 0.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between LUG.TO and HIMS is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2019 | 0.11 |
Fundamentals
LUG.TO:
CA$19.02B
HIMS:
$6.20B
LUG.TO:
CA$3.77
HIMS:
-$0.05
LUG.TO:
9.50
HIMS:
2.81
LUG.TO:
13.96
HIMS:
13.91
LUG.TO:
CA$2.00B
HIMS:
$2.37B
LUG.TO:
CA$1.41B
HIMS:
$1.70B
LUG.TO:
CA$1.43B
HIMS:
$16.04M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LUG.TO vs. HIMS — Risk / Return Rank
LUG.TO
HIMS
LUG.TO vs. HIMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) and Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LUG.TO | HIMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 0.95 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.58 | -0.65 | +1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.50 | -1.07 | +2.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LUG.TO | HIMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 | -0.53 | +0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.17 | 0.22 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.22 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
LUG.TO vs. HIMS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LUG.TO drawdown since its inception was -94.74%, which is greater than HIMS's maximum drawdown of -87.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUG.TO and HIMS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LUG.TO | HIMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.74% | -87.01% | -7.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.14% | -78.30% | +43.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.14% | -79.64% | +44.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.94% | -79.64% | +40.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.86% | -61.16% | +26.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.65% | -43.06% | -24.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.50% | 47.57% | -34.07% |
Volatility
LUG.TO vs. HIMS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) is 17.75%, while Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) has a volatility of 26.26%. This indicates that LUG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LUG.TO | HIMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.75% | 26.26% | -8.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.85% | 66.59% | -24.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.10% | 96.12% | -40.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.53% | 83.63% | -37.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.39% | 77.54% | -34.15% |
Dividends
LUG.TO vs. HIMS - Dividend Comparison
LUG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.30%, while HIMS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIMS Hims & Hers Health, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LUG.TO Lundin Gold Inc. | 5.30% | 3.35% | 2.69% | 3.26% | 1.97% |
Financials
LUG.TO vs. HIMS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lundin Gold Inc. and Hims & Hers Health, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LUG.TO vs. HIMS - Profitability Comparison
LUG.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported a gross profit of 420.70M and revenue of 567.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.2%.
HIMS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hims & Hers Health, Inc. reported a gross profit of 396.79M and revenue of 608.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.3%.
LUG.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported an operating income of 391.03M and revenue of 567.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 68.9%.
HIMS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hims & Hers Health, Inc. reported an operating income of -78.32M and revenue of 608.10M, resulting in an operating margin of -12.9%.
LUG.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported a net income of 273.33M and revenue of 567.38M, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.
HIMS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hims & Hers Health, Inc. reported a net income of -92.12M and revenue of 608.10M, resulting in a net margin of -15.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LUG.TO and HIMS have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for LUG.TO and HIMS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer