LUG.TO vs. FFIV

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

LUG.TO (Lundin Gold Inc.) and FFIV (F5 Networks, Inc.) are both stocks. LUG.TO operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while FFIV operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 10 years, LUG.TO returned 32.69%/yr vs 13.84%/yr for FFIV. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LUG.TO vs. FFIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) and F5 Networks, Inc. (FFIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

LUG.TO is traded in CAD, while FFIV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FFIV values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LUG.TO achieves a -26.40% return, which is significantly lower than FFIV's 58.35% return. Over the past 10 years, LUG.TO has outperformed FFIV with an annualized return of 32.69%, while FFIV has yielded a comparatively lower 13.84% annualized return.

LUG.TO

• 1D: 1.08%
• 1M: -4.54%
• YTD: -26.40%
• 6M: -24.67%
• 1Y: 16.11%
• 3Y*: 79.74%
• 5Y*: 53.19%
• 10Y*: 32.69%

FFIV

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: 10.78%
• YTD: 58.35%
• 6M: 52.97%
• 1Y: 42.04%
• 3Y*: 40.18%
• 5Y*: 18.89%
• 10Y*: 13.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LUG.TO vs. FFIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LUG.TO Lundin Gold Inc.	-26.40%	291.22%	91.60%	29.55%	30.60%	-4.67%	31.21%	66.93%	10.15%	-13.88%
FFIV F5 Networks, Inc.	58.35%	-3.13%	52.40%	21.75%	-37.64%	39.02%	23.00%	-17.36%	33.86%	-15.47%

Correlation

The correlation between LUG.TO and FFIV is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.05
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006	0.03

Fundamentals

Market Cap LUG.TO : CA$18.65B FFIV : $22.70B
EPS LUG.TO : $3.77 FFIV : $12.19
PE Ratio LUG.TO : 14.57 FFIV : 32.50
PEG Ratio LUG.TO : 0.19 FFIV : 1.42
PS Ratio LUG.TO : 6.66 FFIV : 9.54
PB Ratio LUG.TO : 9.79 FFIV : 6.22
Total Revenue (TTM) LUG.TO : $2.00B FFIV : $2.41B
Gross Profit (TTM) LUG.TO : $1.41B FFIV : $2.63B
EBITDA (TTM) LUG.TO : $1.43B FFIV : $889.95M

Return for Risk

LUG.TO vs. FFIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LUG.TO

LUG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 53
LUG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
LUG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
LUG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 51
LUG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
LUG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 56

FFIV

FFIV Risk / Return Rank: 69
FFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
FFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
FFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LUG.TO vs. FFIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) and F5 Networks, Inc. (FFIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LUG.TO	FFIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.32	1.15	-0.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.79	1.67	-0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.22	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.46	1.12	-0.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.23	2.35	-1.11

LUG.TO vs. FFIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LUG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the FFIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LUG.TO and FFIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LUG.TO vs. FFIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LUG.TO drawdown since its inception was -94.74%, which is greater than FFIV's maximum drawdown of -62.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUG.TO and FFIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	LUG.TO	FFIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.74%	-62.33%	-32.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.89%	-34.98%	-2.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.89%	-34.98%	-2.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.89%	-44.46%	+6.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.84%	-50.40%	+8.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-34.73%	-2.51%	-32.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-67.67%	-20.13%	-47.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.24%	16.61%	-2.37%

Volatility

LUG.TO vs. FFIV - Volatility Comparison

Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) has a higher volatility of 17.86% compared to F5 Networks, Inc. (FFIV) at 9.16%. This indicates that LUG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LUG.TO	FFIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.86%	9.16%	+8.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.07%	25.04%	+17.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	55.97%	33.94%	+22.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.54%	30.62%	+15.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.40%	30.26%	+13.14%

Dividends

LUG.TO vs. FFIV - Dividend Comparison

LUG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.79%, while FFIV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
FFIV F5 Networks, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LUG.TO Lundin Gold Inc.	6.79%	3.35%	2.69%	3.26%	1.97%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LUG.TO and FFIV in my portfolio?

LUG.TO and FFIV have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.