PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LUCD vs. PM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LUCD vs. PM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lucid Diagnostics Inc. (LUCD) and Philip Morris International Inc. (PM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LUCD achieves a -7.80% return, which is significantly lower than PM's 10.67% return.


LUCD

1D
-2.43%
1M
-7.80%
YTD
-7.80%
6M
-3.37%
1Y
-20.24%
3Y*
-15.74%
5Y*
10Y*

PM

1D
1.31%
1M
3.99%
YTD
10.67%
6M
18.07%
1Y
-0.11%
3Y*
29.88%
5Y*
17.91%
10Y*
11.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LUCD vs. PM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LUCD
Lucid Diagnostics Inc.
-7.80%33.14%-41.94%3.68%-74.67%-54.34%
PM
Philip Morris International Inc.
10.67%37.99%34.34%-1.85%12.31%-2.59%

Correlation

The correlation between LUCD and PM is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2021

0.03

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LUCD:

$140.80M

PM:

$274.96B

EPS

LUCD:

-$210.67

PM:

$7.12

PS Ratio

LUCD:

0.09

PM:

6.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

LUCD:

$1.26B

PM:

$41.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LUCD:

-$370.89M

PM:

$27.93B

EBITDA (TTM)

LUCD:

-$12.14B

PM:

$17.74B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Lucid Diagnostics Inc.

Philip Morris International Inc.

Return for Risk

LUCD vs. PM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LUCD
LUCD Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
LUCD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUCD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUCD Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
LUCD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUCD Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

PM
PM Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
PM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PM Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
PM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
PM Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LUCD vs. PM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lucid Diagnostics Inc. (LUCD) and Philip Morris International Inc. (PM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LUCDPMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.02

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.57

-0.01

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.08

-0.01

-1.07

LUCD vs. PM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LUCD Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the PM Sharpe Ratio of -0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LUCD and PM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LUCDPMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.33

-0.00

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.61

0.52

-1.14

Drawdowns

LUCD vs. PM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LUCD drawdown since its inception was -94.30%, which is greater than PM's maximum drawdown of -42.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUCD and PM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LUCDPMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.30%

-42.87%

-51.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.58%

-20.64%

-14.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.35%

-20.64%

-41.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.45%

-8.30%

-83.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.73%

-10.03%

-74.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.77%

10.75%

+8.02%

Volatility

LUCD vs. PM - Volatility Comparison

Lucid Diagnostics Inc. (LUCD) has a higher volatility of 13.84% compared to Philip Morris International Inc. (PM) at 9.48%. This indicates that LUCD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LUCDPMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.84%

9.48%

+4.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.76%

20.96%

+21.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.53%

27.55%

+33.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.37%

22.69%

+44.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.37%

24.43%

+42.94%

Dividends

LUCD vs. PM - Dividend Comparison

LUCD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LUCD
Lucid Diagnostics Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PM
Philip Morris International Inc.
3.27%3.52%4.40%5.46%4.98%5.16%5.73%5.43%6.73%3.99%4.50%4.60%

Financials

LUCD vs. PM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lucid Diagnostics Inc. and Philip Morris International Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
1.26B
10.15B
(LUCD) Total Revenue
(PM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


LUCD and PM have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LUCD has higher volatility (13.84%) compared to PM (9.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LUCD dropped -94.30% vs PM's -42.87%.

PM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.00 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LUCD and PM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer