LUBYX vs. DFYGX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LUBYX (Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund) and DFYGX (DFA Two-Year Government Portfolio) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, LUBYX returned 3.35%/yr vs 1.99%/yr for DFYGX. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LUBYX charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for DFYGX.

Performance

LUBYX vs. DFYGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund (LUBYX) and DFA Two-Year Government Portfolio (DFYGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LUBYX having a 1.44% return and DFYGX slightly lower at 1.41%.

LUBYX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 1.44%
• 6M: 1.81%
• 1Y: 4.40%
• 3Y*: 5.15%
• 5Y*: 3.35%
• 10Y*: —

DFYGX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.21%
• YTD: 1.41%
• 6M: 1.69%
• 1Y: 2.63%
• 3Y*: 3.92%
• 5Y*: 1.99%
• 10Y*: 1.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LUBYX vs. DFYGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LUBYX Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund	1.44%	4.99%	5.70%	5.16%	-0.38%	0.07%	1.27%	3.00%	2.09%	0.73%
DFYGX DFA Two-Year Government Portfolio	1.41%	2.16%	5.15%	5.00%	-3.02%	-0.51%	0.38%	2.20%	1.42%	0.29%

Correlation

The correlation between LUBYX and DFYGX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.06
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2016	0.15

The correlation between LUBYX and DFYGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (3 years) to 0.22 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LUBYX vs. DFYGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LUBYX

LUBYX Risk / Return Rank: 98
LUBYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
LUBYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
LUBYX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
LUBYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
LUBYX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

DFYGX

DFYGX Risk / Return Rank: 56
DFYGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
DFYGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
DFYGX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
DFYGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
DFYGX Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LUBYX vs. DFYGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund (LUBYX) and DFA Two-Year Government Portfolio (DFYGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LUBYX	DFYGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.28	2.12	+1.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	10.78	2.45	+8.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	3.61	2.55	+1.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	11.37	2.57	+8.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	53.56	9.22	+44.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LUBYX vs. DFYGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LUBYX Sharpe Ratio is 3.28, which is higher than the DFYGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LUBYX and DFYGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LUBYX	DFYGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.28	2.12	+1.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	2.46	1.62	+0.83
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.44	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.22	1.85	+0.37

Drawdowns

LUBYX vs. DFYGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LUBYX drawdown since its inception was -2.59%, smaller than the maximum DFYGX drawdown of -4.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUBYX and DFYGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LUBYX	DFYGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.59%	-4.46%	+1.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.40%	-1.04%	+0.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.50%	-1.04%	+0.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-1.86%	-4.36%	+2.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-4.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.10%	+0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.17%	-0.30%	+0.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.08%	0.29%	-0.21%

Volatility

LUBYX vs. DFYGX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund (LUBYX) has a higher volatility of 0.40% compared to DFA Two-Year Government Portfolio (DFYGX) at 0.34%. This indicates that LUBYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFYGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LUBYX	DFYGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.40%	0.34%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.95%	0.53%	+0.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.38%	1.26%	+0.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.37%	1.24%	+0.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.12%	1.00%	+0.12%

LUBYX vs. DFYGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LUBYX has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than DFYGX's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

LUBYX vs. DFYGX - Dividend Comparison

LUBYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, more than DFYGX's 2.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFYGX DFA Two-Year Government Portfolio	2.80%	2.04%	4.84%	3.07%	1.14%	0.00%	0.27%	1.87%	1.82%	1.01%	0.58%	0.49%
LUBYX Lord Abbett Ultra Short Bond Fund	4.41%	4.66%	4.72%	3.69%	1.33%	0.57%	1.16%	2.55%	2.27%	0.52%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LUBYX and DFYGX in my portfolio?

LUBYX and DFYGX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LUBYX or DFYGX?

LUBYX has higher volatility (0.40%) compared to DFYGX (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LUBYX dropped -2.59% vs DFYGX's -4.46%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LUBYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.28 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.