PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LUBIX vs. VSCSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LUBIX vs. VSCSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Income Fund (LUBIX) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VSCSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LUBIX achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly lower than VSCSX's 0.71% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LUBIX having a 2.71% annualized return and VSCSX not far ahead at 2.73%.


LUBIX

1D
0.06%
1M
0.78%
YTD
0.52%
6M
0.39%
1Y
5.85%
3Y*
5.29%
5Y*
0.55%
10Y*
2.71%

VSCSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.33%
YTD
0.71%
6M
0.99%
1Y
4.63%
3Y*
5.66%
5Y*
2.40%
10Y*
2.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LUBIX vs. VSCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LUBIX
Thrivent Income Fund
0.52%7.57%2.93%8.11%-16.07%-0.76%11.61%13.20%-2.60%5.69%
VSCSX
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
0.71%6.75%5.36%6.11%-5.72%-0.43%5.06%6.85%0.88%2.46%

Correlation

The correlation between LUBIX and VSCSX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2009

0.79

The correlation between LUBIX and VSCSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LUBIX vs. VSCSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LUBIX
LUBIX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
LUBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
LUBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

VSCSX
VSCSX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
VSCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VSCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LUBIX vs. VSCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Income Fund (LUBIX) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VSCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LUBIXVSCSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.55

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

3.44

-1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.20

13.75

-7.55

LUBIX vs. VSCSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LUBIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the VSCSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LUBIX and VSCSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LUBIXVSCSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

2.69

-1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

0.89

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

1.16

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

1.36

-0.71

Drawdowns

LUBIX vs. VSCSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LUBIX drawdown since its inception was -23.52%, which is greater than VSCSX's maximum drawdown of -9.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUBIX and VSCSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LUBIXVSCSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.52%

-9.36%

-14.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.22%

-1.36%

-1.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.35%

-1.36%

-4.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.12%

-9.36%

-12.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.12%

-9.36%

-12.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

-0.26%

-0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.79%

-0.98%

-2.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

0.34%

+0.63%

Volatility

LUBIX vs. VSCSX - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent Income Fund (LUBIX) has a higher volatility of 1.45% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VSCSX) at 0.57%. This indicates that LUBIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VSCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LUBIXVSCSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.45%

0.57%

+0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.08%

1.27%

+1.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.22%

1.75%

+2.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.40%

2.71%

+3.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.63%

2.37%

+3.26%

LUBIX vs. VSCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LUBIX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than VSCSX's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

LUBIX vs. VSCSX - Dividend Comparison

LUBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, less than VSCSX's 4.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LUBIX
Thrivent Income Fund
4.30%4.20%4.13%3.06%3.30%4.18%5.21%3.42%3.44%2.99%3.16%3.40%
VSCSX
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
4.42%4.32%4.27%3.07%1.98%1.78%2.25%2.85%2.66%2.26%1.93%2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


LUBIX and VSCSX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LUBIX has higher volatility (1.45%) compared to VSCSX (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LUBIX dropped -23.52% vs VSCSX's -9.36%.

VSCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LUBIX and VSCSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer