PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LU vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LU vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lufax Holding Ltd (LU) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LU vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LU
Lufax Holding Ltd
-26.95%7.11%-22.15%-58.03%-60.48%-60.35%10.51%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
12.79%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%16.62%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LU achieves a -26.95% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 12.79% return.


LU

1D
5.06%
1M
-28.08%
YTD
-26.95%
6M
-53.94%
1Y
-37.04%
3Y*
-37.59%
5Y*
-47.72%
10Y*

SCHD

1D
0.66%
1M
-2.61%
YTD
12.79%
6M
14.49%
1Y
13.97%
3Y*
12.05%
5Y*
8.44%
10Y*
12.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LU vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LU
LU Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
LU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
LU Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
LU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
LU Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LU vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lufax Holding Ltd (LU) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LUSCHDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.66

0.89

-1.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.80

1.35

-2.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.19

-0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.62

1.19

-1.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.28

3.99

-5.27

LU vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LU Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LU and SCHD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LUSCHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.66

0.89

-1.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.60

0.59

-1.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.55

0.84

-1.39

Correlation

The correlation between LU and SCHD is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

LU vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

LU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LU
Lufax Holding Ltd
0.00%0.00%0.00%11.60%26.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.44%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Drawdowns

LU vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LU drawdown since its inception was -97.25%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LU and SCHD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LUSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.25%

-33.37%

-63.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.55%

-12.74%

-46.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.32%

-16.85%

-79.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.12%

-2.89%

-94.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-79.63%

-3.34%

-76.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.68%

3.89%

+24.79%

Volatility

LU vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

Lufax Holding Ltd (LU) has a higher volatility of 15.15% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.40%. This indicates that LU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LUSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.15%

2.40%

+12.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.88%

7.96%

+31.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.42%

15.74%

+40.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

80.32%

14.40%

+65.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

80.49%

16.70%

+63.79%