PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTTIX vs. MFEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LTTIX vs. MFEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX) and MFS Growth I (MFEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTTIX achieves a 2.74% return, which is significantly lower than MFEIX's 6.29% return. Over the past 10 years, LTTIX has underperformed MFEIX with an annualized return of 6.24%, while MFEIX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.67% annualized return.


LTTIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.14%
YTD
2.74%
6M
3.14%
1Y
9.01%
3Y*
8.33%
5Y*
3.76%
10Y*
6.24%

MFEIX

1D
-0.34%
1M
4.75%
YTD
6.29%
6M
5.95%
1Y
17.64%
3Y*
26.61%
5Y*
14.38%
10Y*
17.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTTIX vs. MFEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LTTIX
MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund
2.74%9.29%6.73%10.36%-12.36%8.61%10.61%17.82%-3.97%13.16%
MFEIX
MFS Growth I
6.29%12.34%49.67%36.15%-31.14%23.59%31.65%37.69%2.30%30.86%

Correlation

The correlation between LTTIX and MFEIX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.80

The correlation between LTTIX and MFEIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LTTIX vs. MFEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTTIX
LTTIX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
LTTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
LTTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

MFEIX
MFEIX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
MFEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
MFEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTTIX vs. MFEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX) and MFS Growth I (MFEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LTTIXMFEIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.18

1.15

+1.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.23

1.64

+1.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.21

+0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

1.05

+1.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.24

3.43

+7.81

LTTIX vs. MFEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTTIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is higher than the MFEIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTTIX and MFEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LTTIXMFEIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

1.15

+1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.66

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.83

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.44

+0.41

Drawdowns

LTTIX vs. MFEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTTIX drawdown since its inception was -19.33%, smaller than the maximum MFEIX drawdown of -72.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTTIX and MFEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LTTIXMFEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.33%

-72.24%

+52.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.64%

-17.30%

+13.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.77%

-23.24%

+17.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.92%

-36.11%

+19.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.33%

-36.11%

+16.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-0.34%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.68%

-23.73%

+21.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

5.31%

-4.47%

Volatility

LTTIX vs. MFEIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX) is 1.41%, while MFS Growth I (MFEIX) has a volatility of 3.59%. This indicates that LTTIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LTTIXMFEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.41%

3.59%

-2.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.33%

12.24%

-8.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.19%

15.83%

-11.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.38%

21.90%

-15.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.25%

21.24%

-13.99%

LTTIX vs. MFEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTTIX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than MFEIX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

LTTIX vs. MFEIX - Dividend Comparison

LTTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.54%, less than MFEIX's 14.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LTTIX
MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund
11.54%8.13%7.07%3.30%5.88%7.35%2.83%3.68%4.32%3.51%4.03%1.82%
MFEIX
MFS Growth I
14.11%14.99%25.47%4.86%1.05%2.76%3.57%1.57%3.78%2.50%1.61%3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


LTTIX and MFEIX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFEIX has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to LTTIX (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTTIX dropped -19.33% vs MFEIX's -72.24%.

LTTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LTTIX and MFEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer