LTTIX vs. ISNQX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

LTTIX (MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund) and ISNQX (Voya Solution 2050 Portfolio) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, LTTIX returned 6.24%/yr vs 11.51%/yr for ISNQX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LTTIX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for ISNQX.

Performance

LTTIX vs. ISNQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX) and Voya Solution 2050 Portfolio (ISNQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTTIX achieves a 2.74% return, which is significantly lower than ISNQX's 11.63% return. Over the past 10 years, LTTIX has underperformed ISNQX with an annualized return of 6.24%, while ISNQX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.51% annualized return.

LTTIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.08%
• YTD: 2.74%
• 6M: 2.70%
• 1Y: 8.28%
• 3Y*: 8.33%
• 5Y*: 3.72%
• 10Y*: 6.24%

ISNQX

• 1D: 1.15%
• 1M: 1.59%
• YTD: 11.63%
• 6M: 11.51%
• 1Y: 27.01%
• 3Y*: 18.18%
• 5Y*: 10.03%
• 10Y*: 11.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTTIX vs. ISNQX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LTTIX MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund	2.74%	9.29%	6.73%	10.36%	-12.36%	8.61%	10.61%	17.82%	-3.97%	13.16%
ISNQX Voya Solution 2050 Portfolio	11.63%	20.04%	15.16%	20.86%	-19.16%	17.44%	16.39%	24.65%	-10.36%	22.00%

Correlation

The correlation between LTTIX and ISNQX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013	0.90

The correlation between LTTIX and ISNQX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LTTIX vs. ISNQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTTIX

LTTIX Risk / Return Rank: 61
LTTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
LTTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
LTTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
LTTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
LTTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

ISNQX

ISNQX Risk / Return Rank: 75
ISNQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
ISNQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
ISNQX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
ISNQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
ISNQX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTTIX vs. ISNQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX) and Voya Solution 2050 Portfolio (ISNQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LTTIX	ISNQX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	2.30	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.20	3.26	-0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.42	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.47	3.10	-0.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.68	14.50	-3.81

LTTIX vs. ISNQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTTIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the ISNQX Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTTIX and ISNQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LTTIX vs. ISNQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTTIX drawdown since its inception was -19.33%, smaller than the maximum ISNQX drawdown of -33.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTTIX and ISNQX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LTTIX	ISNQX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.33%	-33.88%	+14.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.64%	-9.38%	+5.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.77%	-15.79%	+10.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.92%	-26.90%	+9.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.33%	-33.88%	+14.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.45%	-0.76%	+0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.68%	-4.58%	+1.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.84%	1.94%	-1.10%

Volatility

LTTIX vs. ISNQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX) is 1.34%, while Voya Solution 2050 Portfolio (ISNQX) has a volatility of 4.85%. This indicates that LTTIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISNQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LTTIX	ISNQX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.34%	4.85%	-3.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.32%	10.32%	-7.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.18%	12.66%	-8.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.37%	15.41%	-9.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.24%	16.35%	-9.11%

LTTIX vs. ISNQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTTIX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than ISNQX's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LTTIX vs. ISNQX - Dividend Comparison

LTTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.54%, more than ISNQX's 7.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ISNQX Voya Solution 2050 Portfolio	7.18%	8.01%	1.33%	6.04%	31.37%	2.78%	6.32%	8.18%	6.96%	1.98%	1.14%	7.90%
LTTIX MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund	11.54%	8.13%	7.07%	3.30%	5.88%	7.35%	2.83%	3.68%	4.32%	3.51%	4.03%	1.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LTTIX and ISNQX in my portfolio?

LTTIX and ISNQX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LTTIX or ISNQX?

ISNQX has higher volatility (4.85%) compared to LTTIX (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTTIX dropped -19.33% vs ISNQX's -33.88%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ISNQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.