PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTTIX vs. FFRGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LTTIX vs. FFRGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX) and Fidelity Advisor 529 Aggressive Growth Portfolio Class D (FFRGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


LTTIX

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FFRGX

1D
0.33%
1M
1.33%
6M
9.37%
YTD
13.03%
1Y
23.10%
3Y*
19.95%
5Y*
10.20%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTTIX vs. FFRGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LTTIX
MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund
2.74%9.29%6.73%10.36%-12.36%8.61%10.61%17.82%-3.97%11.37%
FFRGX
Fidelity Advisor 529 Aggressive Growth Portfolio Class D
13.03%23.41%15.21%20.31%-18.37%16.96%17.58%28.53%-9.77%20.48%

Correlation

The correlation between LTTIX and FFRGX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017

0.84

The correlation between LTTIX and FFRGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LTTIX vs. FFRGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTTIX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


FFRGX
FFRGX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FFRGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFRGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFRGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FFRGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFRGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTTIX vs. FFRGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX) and Fidelity Advisor 529 Aggressive Growth Portfolio Class D (FFRGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LTTIXFFRGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.44

LTTIX vs. FFRGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LTTIX vs. FFRGX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LTTIXFFRGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

Volatility

LTTIX vs. FFRGX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LTTIXFFRGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.35%

Dividends

LTTIX vs. FFRGX - Dividend Comparison

LTTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.54%, while FFRGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFRGX
Fidelity Advisor 529 Aggressive Growth Portfolio Class D
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LTTIX
MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund
11.54%8.13%7.07%3.30%5.88%7.35%2.83%3.68%4.32%3.51%4.03%1.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


LTTIX and FFRGX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LTTIX and FFRGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer