LTTIX vs. FFRGX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

LTTIX (MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund) and FFRGX (Fidelity Advisor 529 Aggressive Growth Portfolio Class D) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction.

Performance

LTTIX vs. FFRGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX) and Fidelity Advisor 529 Aggressive Growth Portfolio Class D (FFRGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

LTTIX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

FFRGX

• 1D: 2.35%
• 1M: -1.11%
• 6M: 7.02%
• YTD: 11.05%
• 1Y: 20.92%
• 3Y*: 17.74%
• 5Y*: 9.87%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FFRGX Fidelity Advisor 529 Aggressive Growth Portfolio Class D	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

LTTIX vs. FFRGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LTTIX MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund	2.74%	9.29%	6.73%	10.36%	-12.36%	8.61%	10.61%	17.82%	-3.97%	11.37%
FFRGX Fidelity Advisor 529 Aggressive Growth Portfolio Class D	11.05%	23.41%	15.21%	20.31%	-18.37%	16.96%	17.58%	28.53%	-9.77%	20.48%

Correlation

The correlation between LTTIX and FFRGX is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017	0.84

The correlation between LTTIX and FFRGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LTTIX vs. FFRGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LTTIX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FFRGX

FFRGX Risk / Return Rank: 59
FFRGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
FFRGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
FFRGX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
FFRGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
FFRGX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LTTIX vs. FFRGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX) and Fidelity Advisor 529 Aggressive Growth Portfolio Class D (FFRGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LTTIX	FFRGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.48	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.14	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.27	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.20	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	8.91	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	LTTIX	FFRGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-32.87%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.16%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.45%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.15%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-2.43%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-5.61%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.42%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LTTIX	FFRGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.51%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.83%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	15.07%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	16.94%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	17.35%	—

Dividends

LTTIX vs. FFRGX - Dividend Comparison

LTTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.54%, while FFRGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFRGX Fidelity Advisor 529 Aggressive Growth Portfolio Class D	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LTTIX MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund	11.54%	8.13%	7.07%	3.30%	5.88%	7.35%	2.83%	3.68%	4.32%	3.51%	4.03%	1.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LTTIX and FFRGX in my portfolio?

LTTIX and FFRGX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.