LTTI vs. XRMI

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LTTI (FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF) and XRMI (Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. LTTI is actively managed, while XRMI is passively managed. Over the past year, LTTI returned 3.28% vs 9.03% for XRMI. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LTTI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XRMI.

Performance

LTTI vs. XRMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF (LTTI) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTTI achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly lower than XRMI's 1.66% return.

LTTI

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 1.71%
• YTD: -0.11%
• 6M: 0.09%
• 1Y: 3.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XRMI

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 0.39%
• YTD: 1.66%
• 6M: 1.20%
• 1Y: 9.03%
• 3Y*: 6.90%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTTI vs. XRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LTTI FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF	-0.11%	2.43%
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF	1.66%	2.48%

Correlation

The correlation between LTTI and XRMI is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025	0.15

Return for Risk

LTTI vs. XRMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTTI

LTTI Risk / Return Rank: 14
LTTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
LTTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
LTTI Omega Ratio Rank: 12
LTTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
LTTI Martin Ratio Rank: 14

XRMI

XRMI Risk / Return Rank: 48
XRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
XRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
XRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 54
XRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
XRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTTI vs. XRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF (LTTI) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LTTI	XRMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.38	1.65	-1.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.61	2.30	-1.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.32	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.47	1.81	-1.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.09	7.28	-6.19

LTTI vs. XRMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTTI Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the XRMI Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTTI and XRMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LTTI vs. XRMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTTI drawdown since its inception was -9.02%, smaller than the maximum XRMI drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTTI and XRMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	LTTI	XRMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.02%	-15.31%	+6.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.08%	-5.02%	-2.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-8.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.79%	-0.52%	-3.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.67%	-5.87%	+2.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.02%	1.24%	+1.78%

Volatility

LTTI vs. XRMI - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF (LTTI) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) have volatilities of 1.75% and 1.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LTTI	XRMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.75%	1.71%	+0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.07%	4.44%	+1.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.60%	5.52%	+3.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.15%	6.91%	+3.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.15%	6.91%	+3.24%

LTTI vs. XRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTTI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

LTTI vs. XRMI - Dividend Comparison

LTTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.13%, less than XRMI's 12.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LTTI FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF	9.13%	7.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF	12.73%	12.35%	11.86%	12.62%	12.84%	2.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LTTI and XRMI in my portfolio?

LTTI and XRMI have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LTTI or XRMI?

LTTI has higher volatility (1.75%) compared to XRMI (1.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTTI dropped -9.02% vs XRMI's -15.31%.

Which ETF is better, LTTI or XRMI?

On 1-year performance, XRMI leads with 9.03% vs 3.28% for LTTI. On fees, XRMI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LTTI or XRMI?

Over the 1-year period, XRMI has performed better with a 9.03% return vs 3.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LTTI or XRMI?

XRMI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LTTI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LTTI or XRMI?

XRMI has the higher dividend yield at 12.73%, compared with 9.13% for LTTI.

What is the main difference between LTTI and XRMI?

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LTTI and 0.60% for XRMI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XRMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.