PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTRIX vs. URSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LTRIX vs. URSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime 2045 Fund (LTRIX) and USAA Target Retirement 2060 Fund (URSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTRIX achieves a 7.15% return, which is significantly lower than URSIX's 12.78% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LTRIX having a 10.68% annualized return and URSIX not far behind at 10.25%.


LTRIX

1D
-0.97%
1M
-0.12%
6M
4.81%
YTD
7.15%
1Y
15.05%
3Y*
15.45%
5Y*
8.09%
10Y*
10.68%

URSIX

1D
-0.78%
1M
0.34%
6M
9.78%
YTD
12.78%
1Y
23.03%
3Y*
17.19%
5Y*
9.65%
10Y*
10.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTRIX vs. URSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LTRIX
Principal LifeTime 2045 Fund
7.15%16.69%16.90%19.40%-18.51%16.55%16.33%25.81%-8.34%21.38%
URSIX
USAA Target Retirement 2060 Fund
12.78%19.62%13.05%18.22%-15.78%17.70%10.17%20.09%-9.17%19.52%

Correlation

The correlation between LTRIX and URSIX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2013

0.96

The correlation between LTRIX and URSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LTRIX vs. URSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTRIX
LTRIX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
LTRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
LTRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

URSIX
URSIX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
URSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
URSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
URSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
URSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTRIX vs. URSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime 2045 Fund (LTRIX) and USAA Target Retirement 2060 Fund (URSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LTRIXURSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.34

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

2.81

-0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.20

12.06

-3.86

LTRIX vs. URSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTRIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the URSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTRIX and URSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LTRIX vs. URSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTRIX drawdown since its inception was -51.39%, which is greater than URSIX's maximum drawdown of -30.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTRIX and URSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LTRIXURSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.39%

-30.33%

-21.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.04%

-8.32%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.47%

-14.35%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.25%

-23.85%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.56%

-30.33%

-1.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.45%

-0.95%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.17%

-4.42%

-2.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

1.93%

-0.07%

Volatility

LTRIX vs. URSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal LifeTime 2045 Fund (LTRIX) is 3.90%, while USAA Target Retirement 2060 Fund (URSIX) has a volatility of 4.23%. This indicates that LTRIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LTRIXURSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

4.23%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.61%

10.29%

-0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.50%

12.35%

-0.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.70%

14.22%

+0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.76%

14.51%

+0.25%

LTRIX vs. URSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTRIX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than URSIX's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LTRIX vs. URSIX - Dividend Comparison

LTRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.68%, more than URSIX's 4.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LTRIX
Principal LifeTime 2045 Fund
8.68%9.31%9.40%4.25%8.71%6.75%4.62%6.93%7.50%4.57%4.48%5.42%
URSIX
USAA Target Retirement 2060 Fund
4.96%5.60%2.55%2.89%10.97%7.07%4.79%5.88%4.77%3.82%3.01%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, LTRIX and URSIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

URSIX has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to LTRIX (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTRIX dropped -51.39% vs URSIX's -30.33%.

URSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LTRIX and URSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer