LTPZ vs. RLY

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

LTPZ (PIMCO 15+ Year U.S. TIPS Index ETF) and RLY (State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LTPZ is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (15+ Y), while RLY is a Global Allocation fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LTPZ returned -0.17%/yr vs 8.16%/yr for RLY. Their 0.04 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. LTPZ charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for RLY.

Performance

LTPZ vs. RLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO 15+ Year U.S. TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ) and State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTPZ achieves a -3.35% return, which is significantly lower than RLY's 15.29% return. Over the past 10 years, LTPZ has underperformed RLY with an annualized return of -0.17%, while RLY has yielded a comparatively higher 8.16% annualized return.

LTPZ

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: -3.33%
• 6M: -2.92%
• YTD: -3.35%
• 1Y: -2.09%
• 3Y*: -1.08%
• 5Y*: -7.35%
• 10Y*: -0.17%
• ALL TIME*: 2.81%

RLY

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 3.64%
• 6M: 8.40%
• YTD: 15.29%
• 1Y: 27.11%
• 3Y*: 12.93%
• 5Y*: 10.64%
• 10Y*: 8.16%
• ALL TIME*: 4.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LTPZ PIMCO 15+ Year U.S. TIPS Index ETF	$12.67M	$8.82M	$7.84M
RLY State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF	$5.13M	$7.99M	$7.88M

LTPZ vs. RLY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LTPZ PIMCO 15+ Year U.S. TIPS Index ETF	-3.35%	4.00%	-4.80%	0.96%	-31.71%	7.02%	24.89%	17.47%	-7.22%	9.07%
RLY State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF	15.29%	20.26%	2.53%	2.56%	7.86%	22.85%	-0.59%	15.63%	-11.72%	10.40%

Correlation

The correlation between LTPZ and RLY is 0.10, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.19
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.16
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2012	0.04

The correlation between LTPZ and RLY shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (all time) to 0.19 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LTPZ vs. RLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LTPZ

LTPZ Risk / Return Rank: 7
LTPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
LTPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
LTPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 7
LTPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
LTPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 8

RLY

RLY Risk / Return Rank: 90
RLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
RLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
RLY Omega Ratio Rank: 92
RLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
RLY Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LTPZ vs. RLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO 15+ Year U.S. TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ) and State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LTPZ	RLY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.23	2.57	-2.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.26	3.51	-3.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.47	-0.50
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.26	3.61	-3.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.54	12.56	-13.09

LTPZ vs. RLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTPZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the RLY Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTPZ and RLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LTPZ vs. RLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTPZ drawdown since its inception was -40.99%, which is greater than RLY's maximum drawdown of -37.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTPZ and RLY.

Drawdown Indicators

	LTPZ	RLY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.99%	-37.75%	-3.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.09%	-7.54%	-0.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.64%	-10.08%	-2.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.99%	-18.94%	-22.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.99%	-34.17%	-6.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-35.26%	-3.15%	-32.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.61%	-9.40%	-3.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.89%	2.16%	+1.73%

Volatility

LTPZ vs. RLY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO 15+ Year U.S. TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ) is 2.08%, while State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) has a volatility of 2.61%. This indicates that LTPZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LTPZ	RLY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.08%	2.61%	-0.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.77%	8.06%	-1.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.01%	10.61%	-1.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.86%	13.46%	+2.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.02%	13.80%	+1.22%

LTPZ vs. RLY - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTPZ has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than RLY's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

LTPZ vs. RLY - Dividend Comparison

LTPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.00%, more than RLY's 3.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LTPZ PIMCO 15+ Year U.S. TIPS Index ETF	7.00%	4.64%	3.71%	3.71%	8.38%	3.56%	1.42%	1.74%	3.05%	2.25%	2.32%	0.71%
RLY State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF	3.07%	3.24%	3.31%	3.71%	5.66%	12.15%	2.16%	3.45%	2.76%	1.85%	2.07%	1.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LTPZ and RLY in my portfolio?

LTPZ and RLY have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LTPZ or RLY?

RLY has higher volatility (2.61%) compared to LTPZ (2.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTPZ dropped -40.99% vs RLY's -37.75%.

Which ETF is better, LTPZ or RLY?

On 10-year performance, RLY leads with 8.16% vs -0.17% for LTPZ. On fees, LTPZ is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, LTPZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LTPZ or RLY?

Over the 10-year period, RLY has performed better with a 8.16% return vs -0.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LTPZ or RLY?

LTPZ is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RLY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LTPZ or RLY?

LTPZ has the higher dividend yield at 7.00%, compared with 3.07% for RLY.

What is the main difference between LTPZ and RLY?

LTPZ is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while RLY is Global Allocation. LTPZ tracks ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (15+ Y), while RLY tracks Bloomberg U.S. Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for LTPZ and 0.50% for RLY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.