LTPZ vs. RINF

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ) and ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF).

LTPZ and RINF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LTPZ is a passively managed fund by PIMCO that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (15+ Y). It was launched on Sep 3, 2009. RINF is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE 30-Year TIPS (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. It was launched on Jan 10, 2012. Both LTPZ and RINF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

LTPZ vs. RINF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ) and ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LTPZ vs. RINF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LTPZ PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF	-1.39%	4.00%	-4.80%	0.96%	-31.71%	7.02%	24.89%	17.47%	-7.22%	9.07%
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF	-0.74%	1.64%	9.79%	0.21%	8.77%	16.20%	1.98%	1.82%	-0.79%	-1.70%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTPZ achieves a -1.39% return, which is significantly lower than RINF's -0.74% return. Over the past 10 years, LTPZ has underperformed RINF with an annualized return of 0.59%, while RINF has yielded a comparatively higher 4.19% annualized return.

LTPZ

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -4.79%
• YTD: -1.39%
• 6M: -2.84%
• 1Y: -2.68%
• 3Y*: -2.37%
• 5Y*: -4.68%
• 10Y*: 0.59%

RINF

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.56%
• YTD: -0.74%
• 6M: -0.13%
• 1Y: 0.79%
• 3Y*: 4.07%
• 5Y*: 5.34%
• 10Y*: 4.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTPZ vs. RINF - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTPZ has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than RINF's 0.30% expense ratio.

RINF

ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF

LTPZ

PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF

Return for Risk

LTPZ vs. RINF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTPZ

LTPZ Risk / Return Rank: 8
LTPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
LTPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
LTPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 7
LTPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
LTPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9

RINF

RINF Risk / Return Rank: 17
RINF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
RINF Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
RINF Omega Ratio Rank: 13
RINF Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
RINF Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTPZ vs. RINF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ) and ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LTPZ	RINF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.24	0.15	-0.39
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.24	0.24	-0.48
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.03	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.21	0.42	-0.63
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.43	0.84	-1.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LTPZ vs. RINF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTPZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the RINF Sharpe Ratio of 0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTPZ and RINF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LTPZ	RINF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.24	0.15	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.30	0.41	-0.71
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.04	0.33	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	0.07	+0.14

Correlation

The correlation between LTPZ and RINF is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

LTPZ vs. RINF - Dividend Comparison

LTPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, more than RINF's 3.82% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LTPZ PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF	4.64%	4.64%	3.71%	3.71%	8.38%	3.56%	1.42%	1.74%	3.05%	2.25%	2.32%	0.71%
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF	3.82%	3.89%	4.68%	5.07%	1.15%	2.76%	0.82%	1.90%	2.47%	2.99%	1.09%	1.83%

Drawdowns

LTPZ vs. RINF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTPZ drawdown since its inception was -40.99%, smaller than the maximum RINF drawdown of -43.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTPZ and RINF.

Drawdown Indicators

	LTPZ	RINF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.99%	-43.51%	+2.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.82%	-2.60%	-5.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.99%	-13.58%	-27.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.99%	-29.18%	-11.81%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.95%	-1.87%	-32.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.19%	-16.65%	+4.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.92%	1.44%	+2.48%

Volatility

LTPZ vs. RINF - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) at 1.22%. This indicates that LTPZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RINF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LTPZ	RINF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.99%	1.22%	+2.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.46%	2.72%	+3.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.28%	5.45%	+5.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.92%	12.96%	+2.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.10%	12.66%	+2.44%