LTPZ vs. RBIL
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL).
LTPZ and RBIL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LTPZ is a passively managed fund by PIMCO that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (15+ Y). It was launched on Sep 3, 2009. RBIL is a passively managed fund by F/m that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. It was launched on Feb 24, 2025. Both LTPZ and RBIL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
LTPZ vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LTPZ vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LTPZ PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF | -1.39% | -1.44% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 1.65% | 2.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LTPZ achieves a -1.39% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 1.65% return.
LTPZ
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -4.79%
- YTD
- -1.39%
- 6M
- -2.84%
- 1Y
- -2.68%
- 3Y*
- -2.37%
- 5Y*
- -4.68%
- 10Y*
- 0.59%
RBIL
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- YTD
- 1.65%
- 6M
- 2.23%
- 1Y
- 3.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LTPZ vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
LTPZ has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
LTPZ vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank
LTPZ
RBIL
LTPZ vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LTPZ | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | 3.76 | -4.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | 6.07 | -6.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 2.00 | -1.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.21 | 7.98 | -8.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.43 | 35.17 | -35.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LTPZ | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 | 3.76 | -4.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 4.10 | -3.89 |
Correlation
The correlation between LTPZ and RBIL is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
LTPZ vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison
LTPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, more than RBIL's 4.42% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTPZ PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF | 4.64% | 4.64% | 3.71% | 3.71% | 8.38% | 3.56% | 1.42% | 1.74% | 3.05% | 2.25% | 2.32% | 0.71% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.42% | 3.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
LTPZ vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LTPZ drawdown since its inception was -40.99%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTPZ and RBIL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LTPZ | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.99% | -0.50% | -40.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.82% | -0.50% | -7.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.95% | -0.08% | -33.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.19% | -0.06% | -12.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.92% | 0.11% | +3.81% |
Volatility
LTPZ vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.58%. This indicates that LTPZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LTPZ | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.99% | 0.58% | +3.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.46% | 0.67% | +5.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.28% | 1.04% | +10.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.92% | 1.03% | +14.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.10% | 1.03% | +14.07% |