LTPZ vs. RBIL
LTPZ (PIMCO 15+ Year U.S. TIPS Index ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds - LTPZ tracks the ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (15+ Y) while RBIL tracks the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, LTPZ returned -2.09% vs 3.92% for RBIL. Their -0.05 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. LTPZ charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.
Performance
LTPZ vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LTPZ achieves a -3.35% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.68% return.
LTPZ
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -3.33%
- 6M
- -2.92%
- YTD
- -3.35%
- 1Y
- -2.09%
- 3Y*
- -1.08%
- 5Y*
- -7.35%
- 10Y*
- -0.17%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.81%
RBIL
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- 6M
- 2.36%
- YTD
- 2.68%
- 1Y
- 3.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.88%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $12.67M | $8.82M | $7.84M | |
| $1.11M | $1.90M | $2.32M |
LTPZ vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LTPZ PIMCO 15+ Year U.S. TIPS Index ETF | -3.35% | -0.24% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 2.68% | 2.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between LTPZ and RBIL is -0.10, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LTPZ vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank
LTPZ
RBIL
LTPZ vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO 15+ Year U.S. TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LTPZ | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 2.05 | -1.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.26 | 7.00 | -7.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.54 | 28.60 | -29.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LTPZ vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LTPZ drawdown since its inception was -40.99%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTPZ and RBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LTPZ | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.99% | -0.56% | -40.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.09% | -0.56% | -7.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.26% | -0.15% | -35.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.61% | -0.08% | -12.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.89% | 0.14% | +3.75% |
Volatility
LTPZ vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO 15+ Year U.S. TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ) has a higher volatility of 2.08% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.30%. This indicates that LTPZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LTPZ | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.08% | 0.30% | +1.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.77% | 0.90% | +5.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.01% | 0.96% | +8.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.86% | 1.06% | +14.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.02% | 1.06% | +13.96% |
LTPZ vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
LTPZ has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LTPZ vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison
LTPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.00%, more than RBIL's 4.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTPZ PIMCO 15+ Year U.S. TIPS Index ETF | 7.00% | 4.64% | 3.71% | 3.71% | 8.38% | 3.56% | 1.42% | 1.74% | 3.05% | 2.25% | 2.32% | 0.71% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.16% | 3.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LTPZ and RBIL have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LTPZ has higher volatility (2.08%) compared to RBIL (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTPZ dropped -40.99% vs RBIL's -0.56%.
On 1-year performance, RBIL leads with 3.92% vs -2.09% for LTPZ. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RBIL has performed better with a 3.92% return vs -2.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for LTPZ.
LTPZ has the higher dividend yield at 7.00%, compared with 4.16% for RBIL.
LTPZ tracks ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (15+ Y), while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for LTPZ and 0.17% for RBIL.
RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.11 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LTPZ and RBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer