LTMKX vs. JLKYX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LTMKX (MFS Lifetime 2045 Fund) and JLKYX (John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, LTMKX returned 11.01%/yr vs 11.62%/yr for JLKYX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. LTMKX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for JLKYX.

Performance

LTMKX vs. JLKYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Lifetime 2045 Fund (LTMKX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTMKX achieves a 9.78% return, which is significantly lower than JLKYX's 12.94% return. Over the past 10 years, LTMKX has underperformed JLKYX with an annualized return of 11.01%, while JLKYX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.62% annualized return.

LTMKX

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 3.45%
• YTD: 9.78%
• 6M: 10.40%
• 1Y: 20.48%
• 3Y*: 16.30%
• 5Y*: 8.71%
• 10Y*: 11.01%

JLKYX

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 5.49%
• YTD: 12.94%
• 6M: 13.74%
• 1Y: 29.09%
• 3Y*: 19.79%
• 5Y*: 10.13%
• 10Y*: 11.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTMKX vs. JLKYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LTMKX MFS Lifetime 2045 Fund	9.78%	15.70%	12.91%	16.64%	-15.59%	20.23%	13.27%	26.84%	-7.93%	21.21%
JLKYX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio	12.94%	20.04%	15.41%	18.53%	-18.04%	18.38%	16.13%	25.07%	-8.32%	17.29%

Correlation

The correlation between LTMKX and JLKYX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2014	0.98

The correlation between LTMKX and JLKYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LTMKX vs. JLKYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTMKX

LTMKX Risk / Return Rank: 52
LTMKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
LTMKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
LTMKX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
LTMKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
LTMKX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

JLKYX

JLKYX Risk / Return Rank: 69
JLKYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
JLKYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
JLKYX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
JLKYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
JLKYX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTMKX vs. JLKYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Lifetime 2045 Fund (LTMKX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LTMKX	JLKYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	2.46	-0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	3.38	-0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.45	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.67	3.24	-0.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.45	14.36	-2.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LTMKX vs. JLKYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTMKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the JLKYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTMKX and JLKYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LTMKX	JLKYX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.13	2.46	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	0.67	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75	0.72	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.65	+0.09

Drawdowns

LTMKX vs. JLKYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTMKX drawdown since its inception was -32.78%, roughly equal to the maximum JLKYX drawdown of -32.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTMKX and JLKYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LTMKX	JLKYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.78%	-32.55%	-0.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.84%	-9.16%	+1.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.73%	-16.11%	+2.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.91%	-25.75%	+2.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.78%	-32.55%	-0.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.86%	-4.66%	+0.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.82%	2.06%	-0.24%

Volatility

LTMKX vs. JLKYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Lifetime 2045 Fund (LTMKX) is 2.69%, while John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX) has a volatility of 3.55%. This indicates that LTMKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JLKYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LTMKX	JLKYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.69%	3.55%	-0.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.69%	9.59%	-1.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.83%	12.05%	-2.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.48%	15.21%	-1.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.72%	16.21%	-1.49%

LTMKX vs. JLKYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTMKX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than JLKYX's 0.01% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LTMKX vs. JLKYX - Dividend Comparison

LTMKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.07%, more than JLKYX's 3.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JLKYX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio	3.19%	3.61%	1.77%	2.16%	8.08%	5.71%	3.88%	8.54%	10.69%	4.33%	3.23%	1.75%
LTMKX MFS Lifetime 2045 Fund	7.07%	7.76%	5.02%	3.26%	6.45%	8.35%	2.47%	3.95%	4.12%	3.21%	3.60%	1.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LTMKX and JLKYX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, LTMKX and JLKYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, LTMKX or JLKYX?

JLKYX has higher volatility (3.55%) compared to LTMKX (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTMKX dropped -32.78% vs JLKYX's -32.55%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JLKYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.