LTM vs. AVHNY
LTM (LATAM Airlines Group S.A.) and AVHNY (Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — LTM in Airlines, AVHNY in Engineering & Construction. Over the past year, LTM returned 33.59% vs 68.42% for AVHNY. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LTM vs. AVHNY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LTM achieves a -7.73% return, which is significantly lower than AVHNY's 2.08% return.
LTM
- 1D
- -2.55%
- 1M
- 10.11%
- YTD
- -7.73%
- 6M
- 2.26%
- 1Y
- 33.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVHNY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.08%
- YTD
- 2.08%
- 6M
- 68.42%
- 1Y
- 68.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LTM vs. AVHNY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LTM LATAM Airlines Group S.A. | -7.73% | 108.06% | 4.91% |
AVHNY Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR | 2.08% | 76.45% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between LTM and AVHNY is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2024 | 0.03 |
Fundamentals
LTM:
$14.27B
AVHNY:
$8.61B
LTM:
$5.70
AVHNY:
$3.21
LTM:
8.72
AVHNY:
8.20
LTM:
12.14
AVHNY:
0.46
LTM:
0.98
AVHNY:
0.72
LTM:
7.38
AVHNY:
1.51
LTM:
$15.01B
AVHNY:
$11.98B
LTM:
$4.47B
AVHNY:
$3.73B
LTM:
$2.94B
AVHNY:
$2.52B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LTM vs. AVHNY — Risk / Return Rank
LTM
AVHNY
LTM vs. AVHNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LATAM Airlines Group S.A. (LTM) and Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR (AVHNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LTM | AVHNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -24.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 26.45 | -25.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 26.47 | -25.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.17 | 43.70 | -41.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LTM | AVHNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | 1.07 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.47 | 1.04 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
LTM vs. AVHNY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LTM drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, which is greater than AVHNY's maximum drawdown of -2.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTM and AVHNY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LTM | AVHNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.89% | -2.64% | -31.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.89% | -2.64% | -31.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.20% | 0.00% | -27.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.30% | -0.77% | -6.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.51% | 1.59% | +13.92% |
Volatility
LTM vs. AVHNY - Volatility Comparison
LATAM Airlines Group S.A. (LTM) has a higher volatility of 18.04% compared to Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR (AVHNY) at 2.05%. This indicates that LTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVHNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LTM | AVHNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.04% | 2.05% | +15.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.54% | 50.10% | -16.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.99% | 65.52% | -25.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.96% | 59.03% | -24.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.96% | 59.03% | -24.07% |
Dividends
LTM vs. AVHNY - Dividend Comparison
LTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, less than AVHNY's 3.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AVHNY Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR | 3.68% | 1.64% |
LTM LATAM Airlines Group S.A. | 3.08% | 4.39% |
Financials
LTM vs. AVHNY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LATAM Airlines Group S.A. and Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LTM vs. AVHNY - Profitability Comparison
LTM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LATAM Airlines Group S.A. reported a gross profit of 1.28B and revenue of 4.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.3%.
AVHNY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR reported a gross profit of 409.06M and revenue of 2.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.1%.
LTM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LATAM Airlines Group S.A. reported an operating income of 818.34M and revenue of 4.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.1%.
AVHNY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR reported an operating income of 379.86M and revenue of 2.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.1%.
LTM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LATAM Airlines Group S.A. reported a net income of 575.99M and revenue of 4.08B, resulting in a net margin of 14.1%.
AVHNY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR reported a net income of 316.94M and revenue of 2.91B, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LTM and AVHNY have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LTM has higher volatility (18.04%) compared to AVHNY (2.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTM dropped -33.89% vs AVHNY's -2.64%.
AVHNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LTM and AVHNY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer