PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTIUX vs. PTDIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LTIUX vs. PTDIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX) and Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund (PTDIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTIUX achieves a 6.33% return, which is significantly lower than PTDIX's 7.32% return. Over the past 10 years, LTIUX has underperformed PTDIX with an annualized return of 9.64%, while PTDIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.60% annualized return.


LTIUX

1D
0.86%
1M
1.51%
YTD
6.33%
6M
6.71%
1Y
16.44%
3Y*
13.92%
5Y*
7.05%
10Y*
9.64%

PTDIX

1D
1.02%
1M
1.65%
YTD
7.32%
6M
7.72%
1Y
18.66%
3Y*
16.00%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
10.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTIUX vs. PTDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LTIUX
Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund
6.33%14.26%14.13%16.51%-17.48%14.07%15.70%23.48%-7.37%19.69%
PTDIX
Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund
7.32%15.59%17.43%18.33%-18.13%15.35%16.04%24.91%-7.95%20.69%

Correlation

The correlation between LTIUX and PTDIX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2008

1.00

The correlation between LTIUX and PTDIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LTIUX vs. PTDIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTIUX
LTIUX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
LTIUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTIUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTIUX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
LTIUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTIUX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

PTDIX
PTDIX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
PTDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
PTDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTIUX vs. PTDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX) and Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund (PTDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LTIUXPTDIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.33

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

2.52

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.87

10.99

-0.12

LTIUX vs. PTDIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTIUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the PTDIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTIUX and PTDIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LTIUX vs. PTDIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTIUX drawdown since its inception was -49.65%, smaller than the maximum PTDIX drawdown of -54.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTIUX and PTDIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LTIUXPTDIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.65%

-54.38%

+4.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

-7.32%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.08%

-13.05%

+1.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.23%

-25.43%

+1.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.12%

-30.02%

+1.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-0.45%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.69%

-7.48%

+0.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.50%

1.68%

-0.18%

Volatility

LTIUX vs. PTDIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX) is 3.51%, while Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund (PTDIX) has a volatility of 4.05%. This indicates that LTIUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTDIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LTIUXPTDIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.51%

4.05%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.56%

8.56%

-1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.09%

10.36%

-1.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.90%

13.58%

-1.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.52%

13.86%

-1.34%

LTIUX vs. PTDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LTIUX and PTDIX have an expense ratio of 0.01%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LTIUX vs. PTDIX - Dividend Comparison

LTIUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.49%, less than PTDIX's 9.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LTIUX
Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund
8.49%9.03%9.46%4.17%7.50%7.06%5.35%7.28%7.75%5.46%4.28%5.59%
PTDIX
Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund
9.13%9.80%12.28%4.40%8.61%8.92%6.01%7.26%9.28%6.07%4.86%6.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, LTIUX and PTDIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PTDIX has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to LTIUX (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTIUX dropped -49.65% vs PTDIX's -54.38%.

LTIUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LTIUX and PTDIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer