LTINX vs. FRKMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund (LTINX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K (FRKMX).
LTINX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Feb 28, 2008. FRKMX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Aug 1, 2019.
Performance
LTINX vs. FRKMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LTINX vs. FRKMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTINX Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund | -1.95% | 10.61% | 10.67% | 11.15% | -13.61% | 7.41% | 11.87% | 4.43% |
FRKMX Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K | -0.48% | 9.91% | 4.40% | 8.17% | -11.57% | 2.88% | 8.68% | 3.08% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LTINX achieves a -1.95% return, which is significantly lower than FRKMX's -0.48% return.
LTINX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -4.06%
- YTD
- -1.95%
- 6M
- -0.65%
- 1Y
- 7.16%
- 3Y*
- 8.67%
- 5Y*
- 4.13%
- 10Y*
- 6.13%
FRKMX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -3.17%
- YTD
- -0.48%
- 6M
- 0.79%
- 1Y
- 7.15%
- 3Y*
- 6.03%
- 5Y*
- 2.48%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LTINX vs. FRKMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LTINX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than FRKMX's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LTINX vs. FRKMX — Risk / Return Rank
LTINX
FRKMX
LTINX vs. FRKMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund (LTINX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K (FRKMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LTINX | FRKMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.13 | 1.59 | -0.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.59 | 2.20 | -0.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.32 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | 2.13 | -0.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.10 | 8.58 | -2.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LTINX | FRKMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 1.59 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.48 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.69 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between LTINX and FRKMX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LTINX vs. FRKMX - Dividend Comparison
LTINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.14%, more than FRKMX's 3.27% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTINX Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund | 12.14% | 11.91% | 10.80% | 4.75% | 7.98% | 8.21% | 5.51% | 12.76% | 9.62% | 7.62% | 3.63% | 8.86% |
FRKMX Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K | 3.27% | 3.11% | 3.12% | 2.92% | 4.66% | 3.65% | 2.56% | 1.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
LTINX vs. FRKMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LTINX drawdown since its inception was -44.03%, which is greater than FRKMX's maximum drawdown of -16.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTINX and FRKMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LTINX | FRKMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.03% | -16.04% | -27.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.98% | -3.42% | -1.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.54% | -16.04% | -2.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.17% | -3.17% | -1.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.22% | -3.64% | -1.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.13% | 0.85% | +0.28% |
Volatility
LTINX vs. FRKMX - Volatility Comparison
Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund (LTINX) has a higher volatility of 2.42% compared to Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K (FRKMX) at 1.96%. This indicates that LTINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRKMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LTINX | FRKMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.42% | 1.96% | +0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.82% | 2.86% | +0.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.51% | 4.58% | +1.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.31% | 5.22% | +2.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.31% | 5.13% | +2.18% |