LTINX vs. FRHMX
LTINX (Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund) and FRHMX (Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LTINX charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FRHMX.
Performance
LTINX vs. FRHMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LTINX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FRHMX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LTINX vs. FRHMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTINX Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund | 3.69% | 10.61% | 10.67% | 11.15% | -13.61% | 7.41% | 11.87% | 4.33% |
FRHMX Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 | 1,464,383.96% | 10.02% | 4.50% | 8.28% | -11.48% | 2.98% | 8.79% | 3.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between LTINX and FRHMX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019 | 0.86 |
The correlation between LTINX and FRHMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LTINX vs. FRHMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund (LTINX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 (FRHMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LTINX vs. FRHMX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility
LTINX vs. FRHMX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
LTINX vs. FRHMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LTINX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than FRHMX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LTINX vs. FRHMX - Dividend Comparison
LTINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.99%, less than FRHMX's 102.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRHMX Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 | 102.92% | 3.22% | 3.24% | 3.02% | 4.77% | 3.78% | 2.61% | 1.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LTINX Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund | 18.99% | 11.91% | 10.80% | 4.75% | 7.98% | 8.21% | 5.51% | 12.76% | 9.62% | 7.62% | 3.63% | 8.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, LTINX and FRHMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for LTINX and FRHMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer