LTINX vs. FFFGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LTINX (Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund) and FFFGX (Fidelity Freedom 2045 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, LTINX returned 6.58%/yr vs 12.38%/yr for FFFGX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LTINX charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FFFGX.

Performance

LTINX vs. FFFGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund (LTINX) and Fidelity Freedom 2045 Fund (FFFGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTINX achieves a 4.15% return, which is significantly lower than FFFGX's 13.46% return. Over the past 10 years, LTINX has underperformed FFFGX with an annualized return of 6.58%, while FFFGX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.38% annualized return.

LTINX

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 2.03%
• YTD: 4.15%
• 6M: 4.26%
• 1Y: 11.43%
• 3Y*: 10.65%
• 5Y*: 4.75%
• 10Y*: 6.58%

FFFGX

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 4.96%
• YTD: 13.46%
• 6M: 15.30%
• 1Y: 30.80%
• 3Y*: 20.54%
• 5Y*: 10.34%
• 10Y*: 12.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTINX vs. FFFGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LTINX Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund	4.15%	10.61%	10.67%	11.15%	-13.61%	7.41%	11.87%	16.32%	-4.72%	13.19%
FFFGX Fidelity Freedom 2045 Fund	13.46%	23.77%	13.95%	20.56%	-18.29%	16.55%	18.22%	25.41%	-8.89%	22.22%

Correlation

The correlation between LTINX and FFFGX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2008	0.94

The correlation between LTINX and FFFGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LTINX vs. FFFGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTINX

LTINX Risk / Return Rank: 57
LTINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
LTINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
LTINX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
LTINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
LTINX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

FFFGX

FFFGX Risk / Return Rank: 72
FFFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
FFFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FFFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
FFFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
FFFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTINX vs. FFFGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund (LTINX) and Fidelity Freedom 2045 Fund (FFFGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LTINX	FFFGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	2.50	-0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.22	3.45	-0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.46	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.71	3.27	-0.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.04	14.49	-2.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LTINX vs. FFFGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTINX Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the FFFGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTINX and FFFGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LTINX	FFFGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.21	2.50	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	0.69	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90	0.81	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	0.49	+0.02

Drawdowns

LTINX vs. FFFGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTINX drawdown since its inception was -44.03%, smaller than the maximum FFFGX drawdown of -54.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTINX and FFFGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LTINX	FFFGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.03%	-54.61%	+10.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.29%	-9.57%	+5.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.16%	-15.42%	+9.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.54%	-27.33%	+8.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.54%	-30.95%	+12.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.18%	-8.36%	+3.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.96%	2.16%	-1.20%

Volatility

LTINX vs. FFFGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund (LTINX) is 1.80%, while Fidelity Freedom 2045 Fund (FFFGX) has a volatility of 4.13%. This indicates that LTINX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFFGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LTINX	FFFGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.80%	4.13%	-2.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.30%	10.24%	-5.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.25%	12.51%	-7.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.34%	14.97%	-7.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.34%	15.36%	-8.02%

LTINX vs. FFFGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTINX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than FFFGX's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

LTINX vs. FFFGX - Dividend Comparison

LTINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.43%, more than FFFGX's 5.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFFGX Fidelity Freedom 2045 Fund	5.79%	4.40%	1.97%	1.84%	12.04%	12.00%	4.99%	6.51%	7.82%	4.01%	4.15%	4.07%
LTINX Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund	11.43%	11.91%	10.80%	4.75%	7.98%	8.21%	5.51%	12.76%	9.62%	7.62%	3.63%	8.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LTINX and FFFGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, LTINX and FFFGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, LTINX or FFFGX?

FFFGX has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to LTINX (1.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTINX dropped -44.03% vs FFFGX's -54.61%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFFGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.