PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTFIX vs. PLTZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LTFIX vs. PLTZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX) and Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with LTFIX at 9.67% and PLTZX at 9.67%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LTFIX having a 11.59% annualized return and PLTZX not far ahead at 11.62%.


LTFIX

1D
0.42%
1M
4.75%
YTD
9.67%
6M
10.05%
1Y
22.88%
3Y*
18.84%
5Y*
9.37%
10Y*
11.59%

PLTZX

1D
0.44%
1M
4.72%
YTD
9.67%
6M
10.04%
1Y
22.84%
3Y*
18.70%
5Y*
9.32%
10Y*
11.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTFIX vs. PLTZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LTFIX
Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund
9.67%17.80%17.28%20.33%-18.84%17.73%16.47%27.27%-9.03%22.52%
PLTZX
Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund
9.67%17.76%16.89%20.36%-18.81%18.12%16.60%27.54%-9.24%22.68%

Correlation

The correlation between LTFIX and PLTZX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2013

1.00

The correlation between LTFIX and PLTZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LTFIX vs. PLTZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTFIX
LTFIX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
LTFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
LTFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTZX
PLTZX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
PLTZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTZX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTFIX vs. PLTZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX) and Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LTFIXPLTZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.37

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

2.68

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.06

12.08

-0.02

LTFIX vs. PLTZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the PLTZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTFIX and PLTZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LTFIXPLTZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

1.98

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.61

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.73

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.70

-0.24

Drawdowns

LTFIX vs. PLTZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTFIX drawdown since its inception was -52.73%, which is greater than PLTZX's maximum drawdown of -34.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTFIX and PLTZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LTFIXPLTZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.73%

-34.01%

-18.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.71%

-8.70%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.70%

-15.73%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.80%

-26.79%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.50%

-34.01%

+0.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.64%

-4.63%

-3.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

1.93%

0.00%

Volatility

LTFIX vs. PLTZX - Volatility Comparison

Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX) and Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX) have volatilities of 3.34% and 3.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LTFIXPLTZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.34%

3.30%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.46%

9.44%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.84%

11.80%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.46%

15.46%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.84%

15.99%

-0.15%

LTFIX vs. PLTZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LTFIX and PLTZX have an expense ratio of 0.01%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LTFIX vs. PLTZX - Dividend Comparison

LTFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.96%, more than PLTZX's 7.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LTFIX
Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund
7.96%8.73%8.47%4.17%8.60%5.83%3.91%6.03%6.60%3.51%3.99%4.51%
PLTZX
Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund
7.60%8.33%7.85%4.12%8.44%5.29%3.60%5.86%5.75%2.73%3.48%3.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, LTFIX and PLTZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LTFIX has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to PLTZX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTFIX dropped -52.73% vs PLTZX's -34.01%.

PLTZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LTFIX and PLTZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer