LTCN vs. GLNK

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

LTCN (Grayscale Litecoin Trust) and GLNK (Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Grayscale - LTCN tracks the CoinDesk Litecoin Price Index while GLNK tracks the Chainlink (LINK). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LTCN returned -12.64%/yr vs -18.59%/yr for GLNK. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 2.50% expense ratio.

Performance

LTCN vs. GLNK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Litecoin Trust (LTCN) and Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF (GLNK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTCN achieves a -45.85% return, which is significantly lower than GLNK's -33.13% return.

LTCN

• 1D: -1.86%
• 1M: -0.94%
• 6M: -34.71%
• YTD: -45.85%
• 1Y: -62.06%
• 3Y*: -12.64%
• 5Y*: -29.58%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -33.21%

GLNK

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 5.89%
• 6M: -15.88%
• YTD: -33.13%
• 1Y: -73.43%
• 3Y*: -18.59%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -2.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GLNK Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF	$2.64M	$1.96M	$1.98M
LTCN Grayscale Litecoin Trust	$209.06K	$258.75K	$357.89K

LTCN vs. GLNK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
LTCN Grayscale Litecoin Trust	-45.85%	-54.37%	-18.79%	650.00%	-40.85%
GLNK Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF	-33.13%	-87.10%	38.45%	840.06%	-18.87%

Correlation

The correlation between LTCN and GLNK is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2022	0.34

Over the past year, LTCN and GLNK have become more correlated (0.63) than their long-term average of 0.34, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

LTCN vs. GLNK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LTCN

LTCN Risk / Return Rank: 2
LTCN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
LTCN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
LTCN Omega Ratio Rank: 2
LTCN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
LTCN Martin Ratio Rank: 3

GLNK

GLNK Risk / Return Rank: 3
GLNK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
GLNK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
GLNK Omega Ratio Rank: 3
GLNK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
GLNK Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LTCN vs. GLNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Litecoin Trust (LTCN) and Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF (GLNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LTCN	GLNK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.96	-0.74	-0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.58	-1.18	-0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	0.86	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.86	-0.82	-0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.22	-0.98	-0.24

LTCN vs. GLNK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTCN Sharpe Ratio is -0.96, which is comparable to the GLNK Sharpe Ratio of -0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTCN and GLNK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LTCN vs. GLNK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTCN drawdown since its inception was -99.58%, roughly equal to the maximum GLNK drawdown of -96.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTCN and GLNK.

Drawdown Indicators

	LTCN	GLNK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.58%	-96.25%	-3.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-72.73%	-89.50%	+16.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-93.68%	-96.25%	+2.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-93.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.37%	-95.70%	-3.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-89.84%	-57.23%	-32.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	50.94%	75.29%	-24.35%

Volatility

LTCN vs. GLNK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Grayscale Litecoin Trust (LTCN) is 10.41%, while Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF (GLNK) has a volatility of 12.05%. This indicates that LTCN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLNK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LTCN	GLNK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.41%	12.05%	-1.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.88%	45.60%	-5.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	64.82%	99.63%	-34.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	99.11%	161.90%	-62.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	140.36%	161.90%	-21.54%

LTCN vs. GLNK - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LTCN and GLNK have an expense ratio of 2.50%.

Dividends

LTCN vs. GLNK - Dividend Comparison

Neither LTCN nor GLNK has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LTCN and GLNK in my portfolio?

LTCN and GLNK have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LTCN or GLNK?

GLNK has higher volatility (12.05%) compared to LTCN (10.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTCN dropped -99.58% vs GLNK's -96.25%.

Which ETF is better, LTCN or GLNK?

On 3-year performance, LTCN leads with -12.64% vs -18.59% for GLNK. Both ETFs have the same 2.50% expense ratio. On volatility, LTCN has been the lower-risk option at 10.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LTCN or GLNK?

Over the 3-year period, LTCN has performed better with a -12.64% return vs -18.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LTCN or GLNK?

LTCN and GLNK have the same expense ratio: 2.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LTCN or GLNK?

LTCN and GLNK have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between LTCN and GLNK?

LTCN tracks CoinDesk Litecoin Price Index, while GLNK tracks Chainlink (LINK).

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLNK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.74 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.