PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTCN vs. BTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LTCN vs. BTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Litecoin Trust (LTCN) and Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (BTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTCN achieves a -44.82% return, which is significantly lower than BTC's -28.20% return.


LTCN

1D
-1.11%
1M
0.94%
6M
-37.33%
YTD
-44.82%
1Y
-61.34%
3Y*
-16.25%
5Y*
-24.69%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-33.04%

BTC

1D
-2.86%
1M
2.32%
6M
-25.00%
YTD
-28.20%
1Y
-44.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-2.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$40.40M$40.42M$55.08M
$228.60K$254.02K$357.31K

LTCN vs. BTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
LTCN
Grayscale Litecoin Trust
-44.82%-54.37%-26.28%
BTC
Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF
-28.20%-7.50%41.93%

Correlation

The correlation between LTCN and BTC is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2024

0.66

The correlation between LTCN and BTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LTCN vs. BTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LTCN
LTCN Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
LTCN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTCN Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTCN Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
LTCN Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTCN Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

BTC
BTC Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LTCN vs. BTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Litecoin Trust (LTCN) and Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (BTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LTCNBTCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

0.83

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.87

-0.87

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.24

-1.34

+0.10

LTCN vs. BTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTCN Sharpe Ratio is -0.97, which is comparable to the BTC Sharpe Ratio of -1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTCN and BTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LTCN vs. BTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTCN drawdown since its inception was -99.58%, which is greater than BTC's maximum drawdown of -53.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTCN and BTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LTCNBTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.58%

-53.30%

-46.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.73%

-53.30%

-19.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-93.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.36%

-49.96%

-49.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-89.83%

-19.39%

-70.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

50.75%

34.60%

+16.15%

Volatility

LTCN vs. BTC - Volatility Comparison

Grayscale Litecoin Trust (LTCN) has a higher volatility of 10.39% compared to Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (BTC) at 9.08%. This indicates that LTCN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LTCNBTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.39%

9.08%

+1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.88%

33.72%

+6.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.78%

44.38%

+20.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

100.83%

47.53%

+53.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

140.40%

47.53%

+92.87%

LTCN vs. BTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTCN has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BTC's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

LTCN vs. BTC - Dividend Comparison

Neither LTCN nor BTC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LTCN and BTC have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LTCN has higher volatility (10.39%) compared to BTC (9.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTCN dropped -99.58% vs BTC's -53.30%.

On 1-year performance, BTC leads with -44.44% vs -61.34% for LTCN. On fees, BTC is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BTC has been the lower-risk option at 9.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BTC has performed better with a -44.44% return vs -61.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BTC is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for LTCN.

LTCN and BTC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Their fees differ too: 2.50% for LTCN and 0.15% for BTC.

LTCN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.97 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LTCN and BTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer