LTCN vs. GDOG

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

LTCN (Grayscale Litecoin Trust) and GDOG (Grayscale Dogecoin Trust ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Grayscale - LTCN tracks the CoinDesk Litecoin Price Index while GDOG tracks the CoinDesk Dogecoin Blended Reference Rate Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LTCN charges 2.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for GDOG.

Performance

LTCN vs. GDOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Litecoin Trust (LTCN) and Grayscale Dogecoin Trust ETF (GDOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTCN achieves a -43.19% return, which is significantly lower than GDOG's -38.06% return.

LTCN

• 1D: 2.00%
• 1M: -0.60%
• 6M: -43.33%
• YTD: -43.19%
• 1Y: -64.20%
• 3Y*: -14.96%
• 5Y*: -45.40%
• 10Y*: —

GDOG

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: -14.90%
• 6M: -47.39%
• YTD: -38.06%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTCN vs. GDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LTCN Grayscale Litecoin Trust	-43.19%	-10.22%
GDOG Grayscale Dogecoin Trust ETF	-38.06%	-19.74%

Correlation

The correlation between LTCN and GDOG is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025	0.80

Return for Risk

LTCN vs. GDOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTCN

LTCN Risk / Return Rank: 2
LTCN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
LTCN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
LTCN Omega Ratio Rank: 1
LTCN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
LTCN Martin Ratio Rank: 3

GDOG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTCN vs. GDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Litecoin Trust (LTCN) and Grayscale Dogecoin Trust ETF (GDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LTCN	GDOG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.96	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.65	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.88	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.30	—	—

Drawdowns

LTCN vs. GDOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTCN drawdown since its inception was -99.58%, which is greater than GDOG's maximum drawdown of -53.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTCN and GDOG.

Drawdown Indicators

	LTCN	GDOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.58%	-53.90%	-45.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-72.99%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-93.68%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-96.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.34%	-53.35%	-45.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-89.77%	-32.23%	-57.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	49.36%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LTCN	GDOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.24%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.25%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.43%	70.47%	-3.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	104.25%	70.47%	+33.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	140.84%	70.47%	+70.37%

LTCN vs. GDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTCN has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GDOG's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

LTCN vs. GDOG - Dividend Comparison

Neither LTCN nor GDOG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LTCN and GDOG in my portfolio?

LTCN and GDOG have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LTCN or GDOG?

On fees, GDOG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LTCN or GDOG?

GDOG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for LTCN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LTCN or GDOG?

LTCN and GDOG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between LTCN and GDOG?

LTCN tracks CoinDesk Litecoin Price Index, while GDOG tracks CoinDesk Dogecoin Blended Reference Rate Index. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for LTCN and 0.35% for GDOG.