GDOG vs. GDLC
GDOG (Grayscale Dogecoin Trust ETF) and GDLC (Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Grayscale - GDOG tracks the CoinDesk Dogecoin Blended Reference Rate Index while GDLC tracks the CoinDesk 5 Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GDOG charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for GDLC.
Performance
GDOG vs. GDLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDOG achieves a -40.10% return, which is significantly lower than GDLC's -30.16% return.
GDOG
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- -5.34%
- 6M
- -34.63%
- YTD
- -40.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
GDLC
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 4.19%
- 6M
- -19.67%
- YTD
- -30.16%
- 1Y
- -42.29%
- 3Y*
- 49.03%
- 5Y*
- -3.08%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 20.89%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.36M | $1.40M | $1.44M | |
| $180.74K | $188.63K | $338.20K |
GDOG vs. GDLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GDOG Grayscale Dogecoin Trust ETF | -40.10% | -19.74% |
GDLC Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF | -30.16% | 3.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDOG and GDLC is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDOG vs. GDLC — Risk / Return Rank
GDOG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GDLC
GDOG vs. GDLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Dogecoin Trust ETF (GDOG) and Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDOG | GDLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.87 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.74 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.12 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDOG vs. GDLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDOG drawdown since its inception was -55.65%, smaller than the maximum GDLC drawdown of -94.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDOG and GDLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDOG | GDLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.65% | -94.14% | +38.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -57.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -57.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -94.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.89% | -55.07% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.65% | -52.83% | +19.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 37.88% | — |
Volatility
GDOG vs. GDLC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDOG | GDLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 35.61% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.73% | 49.03% | +19.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.73% | 71.69% | -2.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.73% | 93.49% | -24.76% |
GDOG vs. GDLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDOG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GDLC's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDOG vs. GDLC - Dividend Comparison
Neither GDOG nor GDLC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GDOG and GDLC have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDOG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDOG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for GDLC.
GDOG and GDLC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
GDOG tracks CoinDesk Dogecoin Blended Reference Rate Index, while GDLC tracks CoinDesk 5 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GDOG and 0.59% for GDLC.
Find the right allocation for GDOG and GDLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer