GDOG vs. GDLC
GDOG (Grayscale Dogecoin Trust ETF) and GDLC (Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Grayscale - GDOG tracks the CoinDesk Dogecoin Blended Reference Rate Index while GDLC tracks the CoinDesk 5 Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GDOG charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for GDLC.
Performance
GDOG vs. GDLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GDOG having a -33.11% return and GDLC slightly higher at -32.51%.
GDOG
- 1D
- -4.98%
- 1M
- -24.05%
- YTD
- -33.11%
- 6M
- -39.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDLC
- 1D
- -3.16%
- 1M
- -17.46%
- YTD
- -32.51%
- 6M
- -32.63%
- 1Y
- -38.54%
- 3Y*
- 49.72%
- 5Y*
- 4.86%
- 10Y*
- —
GDOG vs. GDLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GDOG Grayscale Dogecoin Trust ETF | -33.11% | -19.74% |
GDLC Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF | -32.51% | 3.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDOG and GDLC is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDOG vs. GDLC — Risk / Return Rank
GDOG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GDLC
GDOG vs. GDLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Dogecoin Trust ETF (GDOG) and Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDOG | GDLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.88 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.69 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.16 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDOG vs. GDLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDOG drawdown since its inception was -49.62%, smaller than the maximum GDLC drawdown of -94.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDOG and GDLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDOG | GDLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.62% | -94.14% | +44.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -56.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -56.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -94.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.62% | -56.58% | +6.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.81% | -52.78% | +22.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 33.36% | — |
Volatility
GDOG vs. GDLC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDOG | GDLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.86% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 36.82% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.09% | 49.09% | +24.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.09% | 73.78% | -0.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.09% | 94.18% | -21.09% |
GDOG vs. GDLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDOG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GDLC's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDOG vs. GDLC - Dividend Comparison
Neither GDOG nor GDLC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GDOG and GDLC have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDOG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDOG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for GDLC.
GDOG and GDLC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
GDOG tracks CoinDesk Dogecoin Blended Reference Rate Index, while GDLC tracks CoinDesk 5 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GDOG and 0.59% for GDLC.
Find the right allocation for GDOG and GDLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer