LTCN vs. BITB
LTCN (Grayscale Litecoin Trust) and BITB (Bitwise Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - LTCN tracks the CoinDesk Litecoin Price Index while BITB tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, LTCN returned -52.40% vs -39.60% for BITB. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LTCN charges 2.50%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for BITB.
Performance
LTCN vs. BITB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LTCN achieves a -42.76% return, which is significantly lower than BITB's -27.44% return.
LTCN
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- -19.52%
- YTD
- -42.76%
- 6M
- -51.38%
- 1Y
- -52.40%
- 3Y*
- -6.83%
- 5Y*
- -59.10%
- 10Y*
- —
BITB
- 1D
- -2.76%
- 1M
- -22.13%
- YTD
- -27.44%
- 6M
- -31.39%
- 1Y
- -39.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LTCN vs. BITB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LTCN Grayscale Litecoin Trust | -42.76% | -54.37% | 16.80% |
BITB Bitwise Bitcoin ETF | -27.44% | -6.47% | 99.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between LTCN and BITB is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | 0.62 |
The correlation between LTCN and BITB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LTCN vs. BITB — Risk / Return Rank
LTCN
BITB
LTCN vs. BITB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Litecoin Trust (LTCN) and Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LTCN | BITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 0.86 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.75 | -0.80 | +0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | -1.39 | +0.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LTCN | BITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.75 | -0.91 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.20 | 0.27 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
LTCN vs. BITB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LTCN drawdown since its inception was -99.58%, which is greater than BITB's maximum drawdown of -49.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTCN and BITB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LTCN | BITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.58% | -49.45% | -50.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.62% | -49.45% | -20.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -92.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.33% | -49.45% | -49.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.62% | -16.08% | -73.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.18% | 28.59% | +14.59% |
Volatility
LTCN vs. BITB - Volatility Comparison
Grayscale Litecoin Trust (LTCN) has a higher volatility of 12.32% compared to Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB) at 9.05%. This indicates that LTCN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LTCN | BITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.32% | 9.05% | +3.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.08% | 33.85% | +7.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.66% | 43.66% | +26.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 106.66% | 49.97% | +56.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 141.37% | 49.97% | +91.40% |
LTCN vs. BITB - Expense Ratio Comparison
LTCN has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BITB's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
LTCN vs. BITB - Dividend Comparison
Neither LTCN nor BITB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LTCN and BITB have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LTCN has higher volatility (12.32%) compared to BITB (9.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTCN dropped -99.58% vs BITB's -49.45%.
On 1-year performance, BITB leads with -39.60% vs -52.40% for LTCN. On fees, BITB is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, BITB has been the lower-risk option at 9.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BITB has performed better with a -39.60% return vs -52.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BITB is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for LTCN.
LTCN and BITB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
LTCN tracks CoinDesk Litecoin Price Index, while BITB tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Bitwise Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for LTCN and 0.20% for BITB.
LTCN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.75 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LTCN and BITB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer