PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTCN vs. BCDF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LTCN vs. BCDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Litecoin Trust (LTCN) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LTCN vs. BCDF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
LTCN
Grayscale Litecoin Trust
-30.08%-54.37%-18.79%650.00%-42.78%
BCDF
Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF
1.72%11.63%14.87%24.99%-22.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTCN achieves a -30.08% return, which is significantly lower than BCDF's 1.72% return.


LTCN

1D
0.99%
1M
-0.71%
YTD
-30.08%
6M
-53.58%
1Y
-37.99%
3Y*
0.25%
5Y*
-48.71%
10Y*

BCDF

1D
2.24%
1M
-3.88%
YTD
1.72%
6M
-0.09%
1Y
13.04%
3Y*
15.60%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LTCN vs. BCDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTCN has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BCDF's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LTCN vs. BCDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTCN
LTCN Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
LTCN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTCN Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTCN Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
LTCN Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTCN Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

BCDF
BCDF Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
BCDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCDF Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
BCDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCDF Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTCN vs. BCDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Litecoin Trust (LTCN) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LTCNBCDFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.51

0.78

-1.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.39

1.19

-1.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.15

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.67

1.40

-2.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.25

3.61

-4.86

LTCN vs. BCDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTCN Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the BCDF Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTCN and BCDF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LTCNBCDFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.51

0.78

-1.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.19

0.38

-0.57

Correlation

The correlation between LTCN and BCDF is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

LTCN vs. BCDF - Dividend Comparison

LTCN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BCDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%.


TTM2025202420232022
LTCN
Grayscale Litecoin Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BCDF
Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF
2.48%2.53%1.63%0.69%0.38%

Drawdowns

LTCN vs. BCDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTCN drawdown since its inception was -99.58%, which is greater than BCDF's maximum drawdown of -27.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTCN and BCDF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LTCNBCDFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.58%

-27.70%

-71.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-65.17%

-8.84%

-56.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.18%

-5.09%

-94.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-89.31%

-10.23%

-79.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.69%

3.44%

+31.25%

Volatility

LTCN vs. BCDF - Volatility Comparison

Grayscale Litecoin Trust (LTCN) has a higher volatility of 11.52% compared to Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF) at 5.22%. This indicates that LTCN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LTCNBCDFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.52%

5.22%

+6.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.46%

11.75%

+42.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

75.66%

16.82%

+58.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

113.23%

17.06%

+96.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

143.44%

17.06%

+126.38%