LTCC vs. IBLC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LTCC (Canary Litecoin ETF) and IBLC (iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. LTCC is actively managed, while IBLC is passively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LTCC charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for IBLC.

Performance

LTCC vs. IBLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Canary Litecoin ETF (LTCC) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTCC achieves a -38.64% return, which is significantly lower than IBLC's 32.34% return.

LTCC

• 1D: -1.79%
• 1M: -14.54%
• YTD: -38.64%
• 6M: -45.36%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBLC

• 1D: -3.00%
• 1M: 13.52%
• YTD: 32.34%
• 6M: 15.25%
• 1Y: 73.27%
• 3Y*: 48.31%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTCC vs. IBLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LTCC Canary Litecoin ETF	-38.64%	-22.20%
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF	32.34%	-32.22%

Correlation

The correlation between LTCC and IBLC is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2025	0.58

Return for Risk

LTCC vs. IBLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBLC

IBLC Risk / Return Rank: 33
IBLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
IBLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
IBLC Omega Ratio Rank: 33
IBLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
IBLC Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTCC vs. IBLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canary Litecoin ETF (LTCC) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LTCC	IBLC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.34	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.11	0.40	-1.51

Drawdowns

LTCC vs. IBLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTCC drawdown since its inception was -56.22%, smaller than the maximum IBLC drawdown of -62.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTCC and IBLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	LTCC	IBLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.22%	-62.54%	+6.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-44.94%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-51.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-56.22%	-12.99%	-43.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.73%	-25.89%	-11.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	22.56%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LTCC	IBLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	14.67%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	40.76%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	64.50%	54.94%	+9.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	64.50%	64.49%	+0.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	64.50%	64.49%	+0.01%

LTCC vs. IBLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTCC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IBLC's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

LTCC vs. IBLC - Dividend Comparison

LTCC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF	4.77%	6.31%	1.60%	1.79%	0.84%
LTCC Canary Litecoin ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LTCC and IBLC in my portfolio?

LTCC and IBLC have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LTCC or IBLC?

On fees, IBLC is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LTCC or IBLC?

IBLC is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for LTCC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LTCC or IBLC?

IBLC has the higher dividend yield at 4.77%, compared with 0.00% for LTCC.

What is the main difference between LTCC and IBLC?

They also come from different issuers: Canary Capital and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for LTCC and 0.47% for IBLC.