LTCC vs. BITS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LTCC (Canary Litecoin ETF) and BITS (Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. LTCC is actively managed, while BITS is passively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LTCC charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BITS.

Performance

LTCC vs. BITS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Canary Litecoin ETF (LTCC) and Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTCC achieves a -45.59% return, which is significantly lower than BITS's -1.05% return.

LTCC

• 1D: -6.12%
• 1M: -21.31%
• YTD: -45.59%
• 6M: -46.18%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BITS

• 1D: -2.95%
• 1M: -9.90%
• YTD: -1.05%
• 6M: -4.96%
• 1Y: 16.16%
• 3Y*: 41.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTCC vs. BITS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LTCC Canary Litecoin ETF	-45.59%	-25.94%
BITS Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF	-1.05%	-32.37%

Correlation

The correlation between LTCC and BITS is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.71

Return for Risk

LTCC vs. BITS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTCC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BITS

BITS Risk / Return Rank: 13
BITS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
BITS Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
BITS Omega Ratio Rank: 15
BITS Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
BITS Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTCC vs. BITS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canary Litecoin ETF (LTCC) and Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LTCC	BITS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.31	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.78	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.09	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.34	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	0.60	—

Drawdowns

LTCC vs. BITS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTCC drawdown since its inception was -61.39%, smaller than the maximum BITS drawdown of -83.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTCC and BITS.

Drawdown Indicators

	LTCC	BITS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.39%	-83.11%	+21.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-48.38%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-48.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-61.18%	-34.86%	-26.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.44%	-42.63%	+3.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	26.82%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LTCC	BITS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	14.66%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	40.96%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	63.84%	53.22%	+10.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	63.84%	60.86%	+2.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	63.84%	60.86%	+2.98%

LTCC vs. BITS - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTCC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BITS's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

LTCC vs. BITS - Dividend Comparison

LTCC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.04%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BITS Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF	23.04%	22.80%	29.49%	13.69%	0.48%	1.90%
LTCC Canary Litecoin ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LTCC and BITS in my portfolio?

LTCC and BITS have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LTCC or BITS?

On fees, BITS is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LTCC or BITS?

BITS is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for LTCC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LTCC or BITS?

BITS has the higher dividend yield at 23.04%, compared with 0.00% for LTCC.

What is the main difference between LTCC and BITS?

They also come from different issuers: Canary Capital and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for LTCC and 0.65% for BITS.