LTCC vs. BCDF

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

LTCC (Canary Litecoin ETF) and BCDF (Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LTCC charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for BCDF.

Performance

LTCC vs. BCDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Canary Litecoin ETF (LTCC) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTCC achieves a -41.27% return, which is significantly lower than BCDF's 4.63% return.

LTCC

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: -0.57%
• 6M: -37.42%
• YTD: -41.27%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BCDF

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: 0.13%
• 6M: -1.03%
• YTD: 4.63%
• 1Y: 3.84%
• 3Y*: 14.28%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTCC vs. BCDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LTCC Canary Litecoin ETF	-41.27%	-25.94%
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF	4.63%	-3.63%

Correlation

The correlation between LTCC and BCDF is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.28

Return for Risk

LTCC vs. BCDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTCC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BCDF

BCDF Risk / Return Rank: 13
BCDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
BCDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
BCDF Omega Ratio Rank: 12
BCDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
BCDF Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTCC vs. BCDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canary Litecoin ETF (LTCC) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LTCC	BCDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.25	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.45	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.05	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.27	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	0.84	—

Drawdowns

LTCC vs. BCDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTCC drawdown since its inception was -62.88%, which is greater than BCDF's maximum drawdown of -27.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTCC and BCDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	LTCC	BCDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.88%	-27.70%	-35.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.02%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-58.10%	-6.38%	-51.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.26%	-9.80%	-31.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.60%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LTCC	BCDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.15%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.34%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	62.36%	15.44%	+46.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	62.36%	16.93%	+45.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	62.36%	16.93%	+45.43%

LTCC vs. BCDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTCC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BCDF's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

LTCC vs. BCDF - Dividend Comparison

LTCC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BCDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF	2.41%	2.53%	1.63%	0.69%	0.38%
LTCC Canary Litecoin ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LTCC and BCDF in my portfolio?

LTCC and BCDF have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LTCC or BCDF?

On fees, BCDF is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LTCC or BCDF?

BCDF is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for LTCC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LTCC or BCDF?

BCDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 0.00% for LTCC.

What is the main difference between LTCC and BCDF?

They also come from different issuers: Canary Capital and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for LTCC and 0.85% for BCDF.